Am Sonntag, den 23.08.2009, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 03:22:41PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Doestn't grub-mkconfig need to export it so it's actually usable
> > in /etc/default/grub?
>
> Yes, that seems likely. Sorry about that.
>
Commited.
--
Felix Zielc
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 03:22:41PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Doestn't grub-mkconfig need to export it so it's actually usable
> in /etc/default/grub?
Yes, that seems likely. Sorry about that.
2009-08-23 Colin Watson
* util/grub-mkconfig.in: Export GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER.
Index: u
Am Sonntag, den 23.08.2009, 14:59 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> Looks like this one was forgotten. I've committed it.
>
> Btw, in the future please include ChangeLog entries when submitting patches.
>
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some people s
Looks like this one was forgotten. I've committed it.
Btw, in the future please include ChangeLog entries when submitting patches.
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some people seem to want to disable os-prober for various reasons (e.g.
> they have lots of
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 09:19:12PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 07:31:21PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Some people seem to want to disable os-prober for various reasons (e.g.
> > > they have lots of test
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 07:31:21PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Some people seem to want to disable os-prober for various reasons (e.g.
> > they have lots of test installations lying around that they don't
> > normally want to get i
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some people seem to want to disable os-prober for various reasons (e.g.
> they have lots of test installations lying around that they don't
> normally want to get in the way, or they don't want installations on
> external driv
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 13:58 -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> er, hmm, Configure option versus runtime option? I don't know from my
> cursory inspection if there's an issue here, but you (Colin) would be
> able to describe how/whether that's relevant
I think the configurations options is the only w
Pavel Roskin wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 16:38 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Hi,
Some people seem to want to disable os-prober for various reasons (e.g.
they have lots of test installations lying around that they don't
normally want to get in the way, or they don't want installations on
external
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 16:38 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some people seem to want to disable os-prober for various reasons (e.g.
> they have lots of test installations lying around that they don't
> normally want to get in the way, or they don't want installations on
> external drives to b
Hi,
Some people seem to want to disable os-prober for various reasons (e.g.
they have lots of test installations lying around that they don't
normally want to get in the way, or they don't want installations on
external drives to be included permanently in the boot menu, etc.). Now,
they can just
11 matches
Mail list logo
