On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 15:51 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 15:28 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> >
> > Luckly they now found a working backup from May 27 [0]
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-06/msg00027.html
> > I checked it out with rsync a
Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 15:28 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
>
> Luckly they now found a working backup from May 27 [0]
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-06/msg00027.html
> I checked it out with rsync and verified it with `svnadmin verify'
> It's up to rev 2238 so we on
Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 12:13 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Savannah has recovered now:
> https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=5828
>
> I checked out both their SVN backups with rsync.
> The April one seems to be really working but the incomplete May not:
> $ svnadmin verify gru
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 13:54 -0700 schrieb David Miller:
>> From: Marco Gerards
>> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:17:46 +0200
>>
>> > No offense, but didn't Okuji implement more than most of us did? He
>> > actually wrote all the intial co
From: Felix Zielcke
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:12:15 +0200
> Okuji already said once [0] that he could add a new co-maintainer.
> The only reply was from Robert [1] that he doestn't have time.
> I wonder why I didn't reply. Well anyway I would have time but I don't
> think I would be a good GNU ma
Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 13:54 -0700 schrieb David Miller:
> From: Marco Gerards
> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:17:46 +0200
>
> > No offense, but didn't Okuji implement more than most of us did? He
> > actually wrote all the intial code of GRUB 2 from scratch.
>
> RMS did the same for GCC, but
From: Marco Gerards
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:17:46 +0200
> No offense, but didn't Okuji implement more than most of us did? He
> actually wrote all the intial code of GRUB 2 from scratch.
RMS did the same for GCC, but now he concentrates his efforts
on other activities and doesn't pretend to b
David Miller writes:
> From: Felix Zielcke
> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:13:02 +0200
>
>> Unfortunately Okuji already objected against git [0]
>
> That was a year and a half ago, and how much has Okuji even made
> postings to this mailing list lately?
>
> Remind me what the definition of "maintain
From: Felix Zielcke
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:13:02 +0200
> Unfortunately Okuji already objected against git [0]
That was a year and a half ago, and how much has Okuji even made
postings to this mailing list lately?
Remind me what the definition of "maintainer" is?
I think the people actually
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 09:37 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> It looks like savannah.gnu.org has suffered a data loss. The last
> valid
> backup is for April. Please see http://savannah.gnu.org/ for details.
>
> Since now having a repository affects out effectiveness, we may opt to
> switch to
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 17:23 -0400 schrieb Gregg C Levine:
> Hello!
> A suggestion. If we do indeed switch from subversion to git for a repository
> then we'll need to post easy to use and understand instructions.
>
> These instructions should include all of the steps necessary to create a
> l
m: grub-devel-bounces+hansolofalcon=worldnet.att@gnu.org
[mailto:grub-devel-
> bounces+hansolofalcon=worldnet.att@gnu.org] On Behalf Of David Miller
> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 5:12 PM
> To: grub-devel@gnu.org; pro...@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org
>
>
From: Pavel Roskin
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:37:23 -0400
> Since now having a repository affects out effectiveness, we may opt to
> switch to a git repository.
Yes, please, let's do this :-)
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:59:05PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Michael Gorven wrote:
> > I've found Bazaar the nicest to work with out of the major DVCSs. I also
> > think
> > that it has the lowest learning curve from Subversion (e.g. bound branc
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 09:37 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
>
> My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git should be up-to-date, as it was
> mirrored by a cron job twice an hour.
>
It is. The last commit made was by you with rev 2240
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/commit-grub/2009-05/index.ht
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko <
phco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> git has advantage of being supported on savannah
> >
>
Git is nice.
Also, any SCCS that has a secondary http method of access helps when
checkouts come from behind corporate firewalls.
--
Bruce O. Bens
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Michael Gorven wrote:
> On Monday 01 June 2009 16:22:12 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> I say we should go for git. It would safeguard us from possible future
>> problems with savannah as we can easily switch between different git
>> mirrors. Additionally th
"Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" writes:
> I say we should go for git. It would safeguard us from possible future
> problems with savannah as we can easily switch between different git
> mirrors. Additionally the main argument not to switch to git was that
> it doesn't give much benefit considerin
On Monday 01 June 2009 16:22:12 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> I say we should go for git. It would safeguard us from possible future
> problems with savannah as we can easily switch between different git
> mirrors. Additionally the main argument not to switch to git was that
> it doesn't g
Quoting James Jarvis :
Hi Pavel,
If needed (unlikely) I have a checkout of Rev 2238 (2009-05-27).
The git repository ends at the revision 2240, which is newer.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.g
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> It looks like savannah.gnu.org has suffered a data loss. The last valid
> backup is for April. Please see http://savannah.gnu.org/ for details.
>
> My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git should be up-to-date, as it was
> mirrored
On Monday 01 June 2009 15:37:23 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git should be up-to-date, as it was
> mirrored by a cron job twice an hour.
I have a Bazaar repo up to r2240 (2009-05-28 22:08:33) and a Mercurial repo up
to r2238 (Tue May 26 23:19:42) if it helps.
Michae
Hi Pavel,
If needed (unlikely) I have a checkout of Rev 2238 (2009-05-27).
Cheers,
James
Pavel Roskin wrote:
Hello!
It looks like savannah.gnu.org has suffered a data loss. The last valid
backup is for April. Please see http://savannah.gnu.org/ for details.
My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/
Hello!
It looks like savannah.gnu.org has suffered a data loss. The last valid
backup is for April. Please see http://savannah.gnu.org/ for details.
My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git should be up-to-date, as it was
mirrored by a cron job twice an hour.
Since now having a repository affe
24 matches
Mail list logo
