Joe Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>I am curious if support for x86_64 still uses -m32 in the build process,
>>>and if so, why?
>>>
>>>
>>My question: why not?
>>
>>
> I just created a simply dummy program and tried to compile it with a
> 64bit only compiler, cross-compiling or not, t
Marco Gerards wrote:
>Joe Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>>Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:.
>>
>>
>>
>>>* Add support for x86_64.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I am curious if support for x86_64 still uses -m32 in the build process,
>>and if so, why?
>>
>>
>My question: why not?
>
>
I just
Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Cyril,
> yes I am a Solaris developer. [Open]Solaris x86 uses grub legacy to boot.
> And our plans for Polaris involve using GRUB2 in order to reuse as much
> code as possible. Multiboot naturally is a part of the game. And extending
> it to PPC arch i
On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> >> > I just committed the regenerated powerpc-ieee1275.mk to CVS.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
>
Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> > I just committed the regenerated powerpc-ieee1275.mk to CVS.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Does this mean that I can pull a new download from CVS and then b
On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > I just committed the regenerated powerpc-ieee1275.mk to CVS.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Does this mean that I can pull a new download from CVS and then build
> >> on PowerPC without issue now ?
> >>
> >
Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I just committed the regenerated powerpc-ieee1275.mk to CVS.
>> >
>>
>> Does this mean that I can pull a new download from CVS and then build
>> on PowerPC without issue now ?
>>
>
> Should work [it did for me :) on Peg with Gentoo]
How does it work f
Joe Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:.
>
>>* Add support for x86_64.
>>
>
> I am curious if support for x86_64 still uses -m32 in the build process,
> and if so, why?
It does. And the reason is that it works like that for me. My
question: why not?
At the moment GR
On 10/16/05, Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/16/05, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:.
>* Add support for x86_64.
>
I am curious if support for x86_64 still uses -m32 in the build process,
and if so, why?
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On 10/16/05, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it for
> > > me,
> > > but I am not sure I didn't miss something i
On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it for
> > me,
> > but I am not sure I didn't miss something important.
>
> Right. I committed a patch that changed powerpc-iee
Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it for me,
> but I am not sure I didn't miss something important.
Right. I committed a patch that changed powerpc-ieee1275.rmk, but it
seems that powerpc-ieee1275.mk was not regenerated.
On 10/15/05, Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it for me,
> but I am not sure I didn't miss something important.
>
Thank you Cyril. You probably saved me a pile of time scratching my
head and wondering.
Denn
On 10/15/05, Yoshinori K. Okuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm happy to announce the release of GRUB 1.91. This is the second of
> our prereleases leading up to GRUB 2.0. We encourage you to try it, as
> we have done a significant amount of work towards GRUB 2. Note that this
> release is mainly
I'm happy to announce the release of GRUB 1.91. This is the second of
our prereleases leading up to GRUB 2.0. We encourage you to try it, as
we have done a significant amount of work towards GRUB 2. Note that this
release is mainly for developers who are willing to contribute to our
project. If y
16 matches
Mail list logo