Marco Gerards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Although what if we want additional handlers. Like image readers or
so? We do not need to centralize this. What about this:
[...]
Here is a patch to register and deal with handlers. It decentralizes
handlers and should remove some
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Marco Gerards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Marco Gerards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First of all, we can still keep rescue and normal command. But instead
of
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your idea seems fine, but there is a slightly efficiency issue. For
example, when we need to call a function in the handler, we need to
acquire it using name. We need to do this in every call, as the
handler could be changed next
Hi,
Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First of all, we can still keep rescue and normal command. But instead
of depending on normal.mod, normal command depends on module arg,
which is an option parser. Also, these two type of commands are of the
same command set. In fact, module arg is
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Marco Gerards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First of all, we can still keep rescue and normal command. But instead
of depending on normal.mod, normal command depends on module arg,
which is an option parser. Also, these two type
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:24:23 +0800
Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
First of all, we can still keep rescue and normal command. But
instead of depending on normal.mod, normal command depends on
module arg, which is an option
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Colin D Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:24:23 +0800
Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
First of all, we can still keep rescue and normal command. But
instead of
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 11:24 +0800, Bean wrote:
Any comment for this idea ?
Maybe you could describe was it will give us and what the drawbacks may
be? It's hard to comment on the implementation ideas without seeing the
bigger picture.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 11:24 +0800, Bean wrote:
Any comment for this idea ?
Maybe you could describe was it will give us and what the drawbacks may
be? It's hard to comment on the implementation ideas without seeing the
Hi,
First of all, we can still keep rescue and normal command. But instead
of depending on normal.mod, normal command depends on module arg,
which is an option parser. Also, these two type of commands are of the
same command set. In fact, module arg is implemented as a pre parser,
which goes
10 matches
Mail list logo
