Hi,
Lidong Chen wrote:
> To test it, I am thinking to add the ISO entry in 40_custom script, then
> select
> the ISO from Grub menu. Is it the right way to test it? Or, is there a better
> way
> to it?
I have to leave the answer to the experienced GRUB developers.
Testing is my weak spot with
Hi Thomas,
> On Jan 11, 2023, at 3:54 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i created another bad ISO which i expect to lead to an endless loop in
> existing GRUB (i.e. before applying the proposed change).
>
> Both ISOs can be downloaded as gzip-compressed files now:
>
>
Hi,
i created another bad ISO which i expect to lead to an endless loop in
existing GRUB (i.e. before applying the proposed change).
Both ISOs can be downloaded as gzip-compressed files now:
http://scdbackup.webframe.org/ce_loop.iso.gz
SHA256:
Hi,
Lidong Chen wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. I created a new patch for the fix and added
> you as the “Signed-off-by”.
> My question is how to test it.
I just sent libisofs into an endless recursion loop. Grrr.
For this i created a small ISO with a file which surely needs a CE, changed
Hi Thomas,
> On Jan 6, 2023, at 8:00 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i wrote on Fri, 16 Dec 2022 10:42:13 +0100:
>>> If processing of a SUSP CE entry leads to a continuation area which begins
>>> by entry CE or ST, then these entries were skipped without interpretation.
>>> In case of CE
Hi,
i wrote on Fri, 16 Dec 2022 10:42:13 +0100:
> > If processing of a SUSP CE entry leads to a continuation area which begins
> > by entry CE or ST, then these entries were skipped without interpretation.
> > In case of CE this would lead to premature end of processing the SUSP
> > entries of
On Dec 16, 2022, at 4:57 AM, Thomas Schmitt
mailto:scdbac...@gmx.net>> wrote:
Hi,
i realize that my previous proposal opens a possibility for regression with
a very bad ISO image.
The danger is in an endless loop by a CE entry which points to itself.
The bug which i want to see fixed
> On Dec 16, 2022, at 4:57 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i realize that my previous proposal opens a possibility for regression with
> a very bad ISO image.
> The danger is in an endless loop by a CE entry which points to itself.
> The bug which i want to see fixed currently prevents
Hi,
i realize that my previous proposal opens a possibility for regression with
a very bad ISO image.
The danger is in an endless loop by a CE entry which points to itself.
The bug which i want to see fixed currently prevents this special pitfall.
(Other endless loops by CE are possible and not
