Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-03 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 15:51 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 15:28 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > > > > Luckly they now found a working backup from May 27 [0] > > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-06/msg00027.html > > I checked it out with rsync a

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-03 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 15:28 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > > Luckly they now found a working backup from May 27 [0] > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-06/msg00027.html > I checked it out with rsync and verified it with `svnadmin verify' > It's up to rev 2238 so we on

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-03 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 12:13 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > Savannah has recovered now: > https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=5828 > > I checked out both their SVN backups with rsync. > The April one seems to be really working but the incomplete May not: > $ svnadmin verify gru

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-03 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 13:54 -0700 schrieb David Miller: >> From: Marco Gerards >> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:17:46 +0200 >> >> > No offense, but didn't Okuji implement more than most of us did? He >> > actually wrote all the intial co

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-02 Thread David Miller
From: Felix Zielcke Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:12:15 +0200 > Okuji already said once [0] that he could add a new co-maintainer. > The only reply was from Robert [1] that he doestn't have time. > I wonder why I didn't reply. Well anyway I would have time but I don't > think I would be a good GNU ma

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-02 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 13:54 -0700 schrieb David Miller: > From: Marco Gerards > Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:17:46 +0200 > > > No offense, but didn't Okuji implement more than most of us did? He > > actually wrote all the intial code of GRUB 2 from scratch. > > RMS did the same for GCC, but

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-02 Thread David Miller
From: Marco Gerards Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:17:46 +0200 > No offense, but didn't Okuji implement more than most of us did? He > actually wrote all the intial code of GRUB 2 from scratch. RMS did the same for GCC, but now he concentrates his efforts on other activities and doesn't pretend to b

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-02 Thread Marco Gerards
David Miller writes: > From: Felix Zielcke > Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:13:02 +0200 > >> Unfortunately Okuji already objected against git [0] > > That was a year and a half ago, and how much has Okuji even made > postings to this mailing list lately? > > Remind me what the definition of "maintain

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-02 Thread David Miller
From: Felix Zielcke Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:13:02 +0200 > Unfortunately Okuji already objected against git [0] That was a year and a half ago, and how much has Okuji even made postings to this mailing list lately? Remind me what the definition of "maintainer" is? I think the people actually

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-02 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 09:37 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin: > It looks like savannah.gnu.org has suffered a data loss. The last > valid > backup is for April. Please see http://savannah.gnu.org/ for details. > > Since now having a repository affects out effectiveness, we may opt to > switch to

RE: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 17:23 -0400 schrieb Gregg C Levine: > Hello! > A suggestion. If we do indeed switch from subversion to git for a repository > then we'll need to post easy to use and understand instructions. > > These instructions should include all of the steps necessary to create a > l

RE: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread Gregg C Levine
m: grub-devel-bounces+hansolofalcon=worldnet.att@gnu.org [mailto:grub-devel- > bounces+hansolofalcon=worldnet.att@gnu.org] On Behalf Of David Miller > Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 5:12 PM > To: grub-devel@gnu.org; pro...@gnu.org > Subject: Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org > >

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread David Miller
From: Pavel Roskin Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:37:23 -0400 > Since now having a repository affects out effectiveness, we may opt to > switch to a git repository. Yes, please, let's do this :-) ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:59:05PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Michael Gorven wrote: > > I've found Bazaar the nicest to work with out of the major DVCSs. I also > > think > > that it has the lowest learning curve from Subversion (e.g. bound branc

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 09:37 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin: > > My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git should be up-to-date, as it was > mirrored by a cron job twice an hour. > It is. The last commit made was by you with rev 2240 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/commit-grub/2009-05/index.ht

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread Bruce O. Benson
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko < phco...@gmail.com> wrote: > git has advantage of being supported on savannah > > > Git is nice. Also, any SCCS that has a secondary http method of access helps when checkouts come from behind corporate firewalls. -- Bruce O. Bens

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Michael Gorven wrote: > On Monday 01 June 2009 16:22:12 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> I say we should go for git. It would safeguard us from possible future >> problems with savannah as we can easily switch between different git >> mirrors. Additionally th

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread Otavio Salvador
"Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" writes: > I say we should go for git. It would safeguard us from possible future > problems with savannah as we can easily switch between different git > mirrors. Additionally the main argument not to switch to git was that > it doesn't give much benefit considerin

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread Michael Gorven
On Monday 01 June 2009 16:22:12 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > I say we should go for git. It would safeguard us from possible future > problems with savannah as we can easily switch between different git > mirrors. Additionally the main argument not to switch to git was that > it doesn't g

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread Pavel Roskin
Quoting James Jarvis : Hi Pavel, If needed (unlikely) I have a checkout of Rev 2238 (2009-05-27). The git repository ends at the revision 2240, which is newer. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.g

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Hello! > > It looks like savannah.gnu.org has suffered a data loss.  The last valid > backup is for April.  Please see http://savannah.gnu.org/ for details. > > My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git should be up-to-date, as it was > mirrored

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread Michael Gorven
On Monday 01 June 2009 15:37:23 Pavel Roskin wrote: > My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git should be up-to-date, as it was > mirrored by a cron job twice an hour. I have a Bazaar repo up to r2240 (2009-05-28 22:08:33) and a Mercurial repo up to r2238 (Tue May 26 23:19:42) if it helps. Michae

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

2009-06-01 Thread James Jarvis
Hi Pavel, If needed (unlikely) I have a checkout of Rev 2238 (2009-05-27). Cheers, James Pavel Roskin wrote: Hello! It looks like savannah.gnu.org has suffered a data loss. The last valid backup is for April. Please see http://savannah.gnu.org/ for details. My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/