Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-06 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Freitag, den 04.12.2009, 13:34 -0800 schrieb David Miller: From: Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:58:25 +0100 On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:03:09PM -0800, David Miller wrote: Thanks, but I don't feel comfortable enough with bzr yet. I had to struggle just to

Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-04 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 02:17:29AM -0800, David Miller wrote: So I finally am about to have enough time to start looking into sparc64 support again. And, surprise! The trunk doesn't even build. :-) I guess this one's my fault. Must have left it when adding all those progname.c,

Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-04 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:22:27PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: You can commit to bzr yourself actually. And unless Robert objects I guess your permission to tangle with sparc parts as you see fit is still valid Of course. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy:

Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-04 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:59:00PM -0800, David Miller wrote: I have about half a year of potential regressions I'm about to discover on sparc64. That's not an acceptable situation, long term. I might get hit by a bus or whatever, so it would be nice if someone other than me were at least

Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-04 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:03:09PM -0800, David Miller wrote: Thanks, but I don't feel comfortable enough with bzr yet. I had to struggle just to get things checked out, as the bzr package in Debian stable is too old to use to access to repo. (For the record I disagree with the source

Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-04 Thread David Miller
From: Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:58:25 +0100 On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:03:09PM -0800, David Miller wrote: Thanks, but I don't feel comfortable enough with bzr yet. I had to struggle just to get things checked out, as the bzr package in Debian stable is too

Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-03 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Hello, nice to see you again. David Miller wrote: So I finally am about to have enough time to start looking into sparc64 support again. And, surprise! The trunk doesn't even build. :-) Committed. BTW in experimental we merged sparc64's and i386's grub-install. Do you think it would

Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-03 Thread David Miller
From: Vladimir '$BU(B-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:26:05 +0100 Hello, nice to see you again. David Miller wrote: So I finally am about to have enough time to start looking into sparc64 support again. And, surprise! The trunk doesn't even

Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-03 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
David Miller wrote: Committed. Thanks. You can commit to bzr yourself actually. And unless Robert objects I guess your permission to tangle with sparc parts as you see fit is still valid BTW in experimental we merged sparc64's and i386's grub-install. Do you think it would make

Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-03 Thread David Miller
From: Vladimir '$BU(B-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:22:27 +0100 For me the main reason for or against it is break probability. Merging will avoid stupid breakages like ones you fixed but may introduce more subtle ones You lack a cross-build

Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-03 Thread David Miller
From: Vladimir '$BU(B-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:22:27 +0100 David Miller wrote: Committed. Thanks. You can commit to bzr yourself actually. And unless Robert objects I guess your permission to tangle with sparc parts as you see fit is

Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-03 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
David Miller wrote: From: Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:22:27 +0100 For me the main reason for or against it is break probability. Merging will avoid stupid breakages like ones you fixed but may introduce more subtle ones You

Re: [PATCH]: Fix sparc64 build...

2009-12-03 Thread David Miller
From: Vladimir '$BU(B-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:56:34 +0100 The problem is that nobody of us has such hardware. I would happily do a sparc boot every 2 weeks but I just don't have a sparc You can get an Ultra5 for ~$100.00 USD on EBAY :-) Anyways,