On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 12:41:47 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello Ard!
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 16:29 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > Feel free to keep using it, but please stop demanding that our people
> > > > keep wasting their time on it. If you want to support it in Debia
On 2023-05-12 05:49, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 00:41, matoro
wrote:
On 2023-05-11 18:09, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 20:59, matoro
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2023-05-11 10:29, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> > On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 15:34, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>> >
Hi,
> - we decide that GRUB 2.xx (whichever was the most recent release at
> the time of the decision) is good enough to boot Linux on ia64 for the
> remaining life time of the architecture, and remove it from the GRUB
> tree.
That looks like the most reasonable option to me.
Note that ia64 fi
On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 12:42, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> Hello Ard!
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 16:29 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > Feel free to keep using it, but please stop demanding that our people
> > > > keep wasting their time on it. If you want to support it in Debian,
> > >
Hello Ard!
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 16:29 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > Feel free to keep using it, but please stop demanding that our people
> > > keep wasting their time on it. If you want to support it in Debian,
> > > you can carry it as a downstream patch and shoulder the maintenance
> > >
On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 00:41, matoro
wrote:
>
> On 2023-05-11 18:09, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 20:59, matoro
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2023-05-11 10:29, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 15:34, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu,
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 12:09:14AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Thanks, this could be helpful if we manage to find people that have
> the bandwidth to keep working on this. Would you be willing to spend
> time and development effort yourself on building and installing GRUB
> from the upstream rep
On 2023-05-11 18:09, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 20:59, matoro
wrote:
On 2023-05-11 10:29, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 15:34, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 14:17 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> > On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 14:14
On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 20:59, matoro
wrote:
>
> On 2023-05-11 10:29, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 15:34, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 14:17 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 14:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> >>
On 2023-05-11 10:29, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 15:34, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 14:17 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 14:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 14:06 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote
On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 15:34, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 14:17 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 14:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 14:06 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > Itanium IA-64 support is
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 14:17 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 14:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 14:06 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > Itanium IA-64 support is obsolete, and implements its own flavor of EFI
> > > boot that deviates from
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 02:17:57PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 14:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 14:06 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> > Itanium IA-64 support is obsolete, and implements its own flavor of EFI
>> > boot that deviates from
On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 14:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 14:06 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Itanium IA-64 support is obsolete, and implements its own flavor of EFI
> > boot that deviates from other architectures. Given that IA64 is unused
> > and unmaintained, i
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 14:06 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Itanium IA-64 support is obsolete, and implements its own flavor of EFI
> boot that deviates from other architectures. Given that IA64 is unused
> and unmaintained, it makes no sense to pretend that the EFI changes we
> are making are teste
15 matches
Mail list logo
