Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>
> They might be there because not many people use ruby?
>
BUT CVS is for developpers, isn't it? conf/*.mk could be generated
for releases and ruby would be needed only for CVS version
On Aug 16, 2005, at 1:40 PM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
Should we schedule removal of *.mk files from conf's directory and add
them to .cvsignore ?
Those files will be regenerated anyway and in my opinion they should
not
reside on CVS. It just generates additional versions to both .rmk and
.mk
Hi,
Should we schedule removal of *.mk files from conf's directory and add
them to .cvsignore ?
Those files will be regenerated anyway and in my opinion they should not
reside on CVS. It just generates additional versions to both .rmk and
.mk files when modifications are being made.
Thanks,
Vesa
