On Mon, 6 Feb 2017, 18:55 Jon McCune wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Matthew Garrett
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 01:28:20PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> > See verify.h for the interface. Obviously if you need changes in the API,
> > please say.
>
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:53:57AM -0800, Jon McCune wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure about measuring the commands that GRUB runs. GRUB's config
> > file is a shell-like language, and measuring that file should give a
> pretty
> > good indication
Le Mon, Feb 6, 2017 à 11:11 PM, Matthew Garrett a
écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 07:58:37PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017, 17:44 Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 01:28:20PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 07:58:37PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017, 17:44 Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 01:28:20PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> > wrote:
> > > See verify.h for the interface. Obviously if you need changes in the API
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:53:57AM -0800, Jon McCune wrote:
> I'm not sure about measuring the commands that GRUB runs. GRUB's config
> file is a shell-like language, and measuring that file should give a pretty
> good indication of its behavior. In the grey area between "what is code?"
> and "wha
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017, 17:44 Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 01:28:20PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> > See verify.h for the interface. Obviously if you need changes in the API,
> > please say.
>
> I think that's a starting point, but it doesn't seem sufficient for
Matthew,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 01:28:20PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> > See verify.h for the interface. Obviously if you need changes in the API,
> > please say.
>
> I think that's a starting point, but it doesn't see
On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 01:28:20PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> See verify.h for the interface. Obviously if you need changes in the API,
> please say.
I think that's a starting point, but it doesn't seem sufficient for some
of the cases I care about. For instance, measuring boot
See verify.h for the interface. Obviously if you need changes in the API,
please say.
Le Sun, Feb 5, 2017 à 2:27 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko <
phco...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Rebased and uploaded to branch phcoder/verifiers.
>
> Le Sat, Feb 4, 2017 à 10:24 PM, Matthew Garrett a
> écrit :
>
Rebased and uploaded to branch phcoder/verifiers.
Le Sat, Feb 4, 2017 à 10:24 PM, Matthew Garrett a
écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:08:33PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
>
> > I must have accidentally deleted it on the server. I'll reupload it when
> > I'll have access to th
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:08:33PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> I must have accidentally deleted it on the server. I'll reupload it when
> I'll have access to the laptop in question on Monday
Hi,
Did you have any luck digging this up?
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, 05:14 Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> > Ok. Good. Still, can we use verifiers framework ? We can adjust it if
> > needed. Also it's still post-release material
>
> Where's the branch? I wasn't able to find it
This patchset adds support for measuring grub components and commands into
TPMs on UEFI systems. It supports both the original TPM and the new TPM 2.0
protocols. Grub will measure each module it loads, along with any Linux
kernels and initrds, multiboot images, the command line passed to Linux and
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Ok. Good. Still, can we use verifiers framework ? We can adjust it if
> needed. Also it's still post-release material
Where's the branch? I wasn't able to find it on Savannah.
___
Ok. Good. Still, can we use verifiers framework ? We can adjust it if
needed. Also it's still post-release material
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, 04:34 Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> > For policy reasons we can't put any TPM code into G
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> For policy reasons we can't put any TPM code into GNU project. Can we use
> verifiers framework for this rather than custom hooks? This would allow your
> code to be a single module that can be put into a separate repo rather
For policy reasons we can't put any TPM code into GNU project. Can we use
verifiers framework for this rather than custom hooks? This would allow
your code to be a single module that can be put into a separate repo rather
than a complex patch set. Verifiers framework is in separate branch
verifiers
This patchset adds support for measuring components of grub and what it's
loading into the TPM. It supports both TPM 1.2 and 2.0 devices via the
standard UEFI protocols.
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listin
18 matches
Mail list logo
