Hi,
Tom Davies wrote:
> This might not be the best place to ask about legal issues for edge-case
> scenarios.
At least it would be the place to discuss what should be written in the docs.
The problem is quite specific to grub-mkrescue or people who equip computers
with GRUB and then pass them on
Hi,
SevenBits Tech wrote:
> it is my understanding that, yes, you are required to provide the
> source code used to build the compiled binary.
Agreed. But normally it suffices to point to the place from where one
got the published sources of the free software which one forwards.
E.g. with xorriso
While I don't have specific quotes from the GPL to share in regards to this
situation, it is my understanding that, yes, you are required to provide the
source code used to build the compiled binary. This is because every person who
receives the software has the right to the source used to build
Hi,
i read on
http://wiki.osdev.org/Bare_Bones#Building_a_bootable_cdrom_image
a cumbersome interpretation of GRUB's GPL for the case of publishing an ISO
with GRUB boot equipment. (See quote below.)
Is it really necessary to keep and publish the source package of the
binary distro package if t
