On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 16:49:00 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:43:23 +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> > [dkg wrote:]
> > > Select the smallest known block device that can completely enclose the
> > > RAID member. The larger block device(s) should
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:43:23 +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> [dkg wrote:]
> > Select the smallest known block device that can completely enclose the
> > RAID member. The larger block device(s) should not be considered to be
> > exporting that RAID.
phcoder pointed me to th
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:43:23 +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Try attached patch
hrm, i get a segmentation fault from "grub-probe /" even without this
patch when building from bzr trunk (r3964, i think).
The test machine i've set up looks like this uses a common layering
sc
On 02.02.2012 01:55, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
hi folks--
i was speaking with phcoder today on #grub, about getting messages like
this from grub when a partition that is part of a Linux SW RAID set
(with metadata 0.9x) is close to the end of its containing block device:
superfluous RAID mem
hi folks--
i was speaking with phcoder today on #grub, about getting messages like
this from grub when a partition that is part of a Linux SW RAID set
(with metadata 0.9x) is close to the end of its containing block device:
superfluous RAID member (2 found)
Here's phcoder's explanation of the
