On 8/12/07, adrian15 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mani A escribió:
> >
> > It will be a good thing if, if grub2 is installed to the mbr of the
> > active partition and if a new OS is going to be installed, then we
> > must be able to tell grub2 about it and accordingly it must be able to
> > upda
Mani A escribió:
#1) All Linux installers should set or reuse a ext2 partition next to
the windows one as a /boot one where grub2 is installed.
.. . if the dreaded OS exists. But a single /boot partition is not
preferable over 'but from anywhere' principle.
Well.. this is the old discussion: Ce
On 7/23/07, adrian15 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> THE PROBLEM
> =
>
> The problem about boot loaders in a multi distribution environment is
> the grub configurations being overlapped.
> I think the problem is here is that no one knows that a command called
> configfile
BVK escribió:
On 7/23/07, adrian15 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that if grub2 is going to have scripting and so many new
features we should take advantage of them and change the way computers
do boot.
#1) All Linux installers should set or reuse a ext2 partition next to
the windows one a
On 7/23/07, adrian15 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that if grub2 is going to have scripting and so many new
features we should take advantage of them and change the way computers
do boot.
#1) All Linux installers should set or reuse a ext2 partition next to
the windows one as a /boot one w
THE PROBLEM
=
The problem about boot loaders in a multi distribution environment is
the grub configurations being overlapped.
Imagined this partition layout:
part 1: windows
part 2: ubuntu
part 3: debian
If you install first windows, th
