On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:36:38PM +0530, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> IMHO you guys should release monthly snapshot tarballs for use in distros.
More frequent releases would be a smarter thing to do. Distributions
should not be using non-blessed snapshots unless they're substantially
involved in GRUB de
IMHO you guys should release monthly snapshot tarballs for use in distros.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 14:41, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:55:43AM +0530, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
>> The link for new version
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html#Obtaining-and-Building-GRUB
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:55:43AM +0530, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> The link for new version
> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html#Obtaining-and-Building-GRUB
> - ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-1.98-r2613.tar.gz does not exist.
I noticed this when building that version of the manual, b
I am trying to package grub2 for efi for archlinux
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39904 and
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39905 .
The link for new version
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html#Obtaining-and-Building-GRUB
- ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-1.98-r26
KESHAV P.R. wrote:
This the only site that currently hosts whatever documentation grub2
carries.
Did you see http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/index.html
-- Bruce
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.o
When is the next release of grub2 going to be? Distros like Archlinux
and Fedora do not use intermediate bzr versions like Ubuntu and Debian
do. These distro are using grub 1.98 which is way too old for the
number of revisions bzr repo has seen. Please release 1.98.1 or 1.99
sooner.
I also
