On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 11:20:06PM +0100, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> > That said, if you don't like the idea then we could proceed adding it in
> > debian, but that might close the door to merging in the future (maintaining
> > the script in debian ourselves implies accepting contributions from man
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:26:48AM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
I'm terribly late at repliing here :-) - sorry about that. It's about lack of
time, not lack of interest.
> On Monday 27 November 2006 18:00, Robert Millan wrote:
> > No comments? Are you interested in getting this into the mai
On Monday 27 November 2006 18:00, Robert Millan wrote:
> No comments? Are you interested in getting this into the main grub tree?
> In my opinion, since update-grub needs a rewrite it's a good oportunity to
> merge this now and unify grub.cfg generation across distributions
> (something that wasn'
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:48:08AM +1100, Jason Thomas wrote:
> I think now is the time. Lets do it.
You mean in Debian? If upstream is not interested, I'd really prefer an
explicit answer, just to be sure.
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 06:00:16PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > No comments? A
Le lundi 27 novembre 2006 18:00, Robert Millan a écrit :
> No comments? Are you interested in getting this into the main grub tree?
> In my opinion, since update-grub needs a rewrite it's a good oportunity to
> merge this now and unify grub.cfg generation across distributions
> (something that was
No comments? Are you interested in getting this into the main grub tree? In my
opinion, since update-grub needs a rewrite it's a good oportunity to merge this
now and unify grub.cfg generation across distributions (something that wasn't
possible with the old update-grub because of copyright issue
