Vincent Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You did not load ext2 as a module, but linked it into the binary.
>> I assume you did not use grub-mkimage yet...
>
> Oh, I thought you meant it was used to add them statically in grubof.
No, this is how things work:
At the moment you have grubof
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marco Gerards wrote:
> In that case the usparc port needs a GRUB_IEEE1275_FLAG_... to
> indicate it is not possible to change colors or that it works
> differently.
Good idea.
> Perhaps... Can you put the bug report on the wiki so we will not
> forg
Vincent Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marco Gerards wrote:
>> This is an important test. Please do not remove it so this code can
>> be shared. Just make sure GRUB_IEEE1275_FLAG_NO_PARTITION_0 is set or
>> not set, depending on how OB works.
>
> No problem, I removed it to show that it
On Jul 12, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
Hi.
Here are the diffs powerpc -> usparc, with some comments below.
To be used to know which files can be made common.
I will see about moving the easily shared files.
boot:
cmain renamed in _start (no asm).
Sparc will need to provide it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marco Gerards wrote:
> This is an important test. Please do not remove it so this code can
> be shared. Just make sure GRUB_IEEE1275_FLAG_NO_PARTITION_0 is set or
> not set, depending on how OB works.
No problem, I removed it to show that it isn't n
Vincent Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Vincent,
> Here are the diffs powerpc -> usparc, with some comments below.
> To be used to know which files can be made common.
Nice!
> All the ieee1275 functions use the grub_intn_t type (see includes).
So this can be shared.
> Add explicit ca
