Thanks for your email and the helpful information John.
After some directions from Liam (see yesterdays mailing archive) i
passed my app through valgrind and found out that there are too many
errors happening in the GTK / X level. I suppose that it has something
to do with the way i am using
Owen Taylor schrieb:
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 15:22 +0100, Jrg Henne wrote:
}
As you can see, I tried both suggested routes. However, both of them
lead to the same problem:
Entering
Handle: 0x34000c1
(process:11392): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:1871: initialization
assertion failed, use
Hi,
I'm stuck with the gdk_input_add() function and could use a hint to solve the
problem. So here goes;
The callback function I want to call is a member of a class, but g++ won't
compile this. Placing the function outside the class works, but this is not
the solution I'm looking for.
The
Eelco Schijf a écrit :
Hi,
I'm stuck with the gdk_input_add() function and could use a hint to solve the
problem. So here goes;
The callback function I want to call is a member of a class, but g++ won't
compile this. Placing the function outside the class works, but this is not
the solution
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:14:38 +, Athanasios Anastasiou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After some directions from Liam (see yesterdays mailing archive) i
passed my app through valgrind and found out that there are too many
errors happening in the GTK / X level. I suppose that it has something
to
Hello,
I am writing a GTK/GLIB application that will basically act as an
interface for existing programs, and I have run into some problems
while utilizing the function calls mentioned in the subject field.
My issues are described below, sorry if it is a bit long winded. I
don't have experience
Hi !
I have the following problem with my treemodel : answer to the question
does this node have childs ? is time consuming.
As this question is asked to every sun of a node when it is expanded, I
want to have the following behaviour :
When a node is expanded, tree_model_has_child allways
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 21:55, Ole C. wrote:
(snip a lot)
I have to admit I have only quickly looked over your text and not read it in
much detail, but it sounds like you might not be checking the condition in
the g_io_add_watch() callback on a per-flag basis. Your callback could be
