Thaorius writes:
The error message tell me that I should use -mms-bitfield switch in gcc
options, so, I did, but there are no changes at all.
It's -mms-bitfields (note the final 's').
But if that was just a typo and you did spell it correctly, maybe you
didn't use it in the right place? Are
Nickolai Dobrynin wrote:
Paul,
But do you really need to do that? Most users (AFAIK) never use
overwrite mode, but those who do will be confused with your application.
It's the users who've demanded that feature. The very nature of the
application
is odd. It involves entering a lot
Trying to compile a simple gtk app for the first time under Windows
using stuff linked from TML's webpage. I've managed to produce my app,
complete with little boxes where the fonts should be rendered.
In an attempt to put something a little more intuitive on the screen,
I've come to the point of
Paul,
Thanks for your input. It looks like the obvious way of getting around the
default signal handler for toggle_overwrite is by using
'g_signal_connect_after'. This is *A* way of dealing with that. However,
is it possible to completely drop the default handler so it wouldn't even be
around
Nickolai Dobrynin wrote:
Thanks for your input. It looks like the obvious way of getting around the
default signal handler for toggle_overwrite is by using
'g_signal_connect_after'. This is *A* way of dealing with that. However,
is it possible to completely drop the default handler so it
Found it. I had missed the expat requirement mentioned on Tor's page.
Sorry to bother the list about it.
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
GTK+ 2.10.4 is now available for download at:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gtk+/2.10/
gtk+-2.10.4.tar.bz2 md5sum: ecfcbdc0d23eb7a596b1d58b48838b18
gtk+-2.10.4.tar.gzmd5sum: 9721c3d769d6e8a9ef1905c90e3aee85
This is a bug fix release and is source and binary compatible
with
