Hello
I have at problem with an old linux app I'm porting to OSX.
I have gtk installed from darwinports.
The app calls g++ using g_spawn_asyns_with_pipes and uses g_io_channels
to transfer the output from g++ to a textview.
the problem is that the io callback function which i attach to a io
Hi,
I'm developing an application with GTK+ and created a batch file to set
the path, launch the application with command line arguments. Even after
launching the application the command window still appears, which is by
default. My requirement is, once the application is launched, is there a
way
Sai Korada writes:
I'm developing an application with GTK+ and created a batch file to set
the path, launch the application with command line arguments.
... presumably on Windows?
Even after launching the application the command window still
appears, which is by default. My requirement
But it's the same button :'( !
David Nec(as (Yeti) a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 08:18:42PM +0100, Guillaume Charhon wrote:
When I do
guint i,j;
int test;
i = 4;
j = 6;
g_object_set_data(G_OBJECT(game-pButton[i][j]), position_x,
GUINT_TO_POINTER(i));
test =
--- Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 22:36 -0800, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
FWIW, this version apparently breaks 'make test' of Gtk2-1.141.
What _is_ Gtk2-1.141?! This cannot break anything, specially in a gtk+
2.8 setting that uses pangoxft, no. But file a
You were right, I've find the problem, the bouton was recreated in an
other function. So the first button with the data was erased...
Thanks you for your useful help!
Guillaume
Guillaume Charhon a écrit :
I've checked the adresses, they are not the same.
The second button is get from a click,
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 10:23:13PM -0700, Jim George wrote:
shell to run the commandline specified. I'm not sure the behavior on
Windows, but I imagine it probably uses the windows shell to execute the
command line.
There is no shell in Windows, and there is no argument parsing of the
cmd.exe is surprisingly more powerful than a lot of people realize
though I still personally abhor it.
-jkl
May be so, but you can't do things that you take for granted in Unix,
like running multiple commands in sequence with a semicolon. And, as
far as I know, the system function in most
Jim George wrote:
cmd.exe is surprisingly more powerful than a lot of people realize
though I still personally abhor it.
-jkl
May be so, but you can't do things that you take for granted in Unix,
like running multiple commands in sequence with a semicolon. And, as
You can string them
