On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 20:37 -0500, Michael McCann wrote:
> Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
>
> Yes, I've already tried that, to no avail. My code basically only
> consists of:
>
> gdk_screen_get_default(): Get the default screen
> gdk_screen_get_root_window(): Get the root window
> gdk_pixbuf_get_fr
amol wrote:
> Hi
> If i used gtk_builder_add_from_string to parse some string for builder
> which already has some content then application terminates with
> following message
> >Gtk-ERROR **: file gtkbuilder.c: line 567
> (apply_delayed_properties): assertion failed: (object != NULL)
> if
I've got a multithreaded GTK application. One thread runs gtk_main():
gtk_threads_enter();
gtk_main();
gtk_threads_leave();
The other thread is an infinite loop that sleeps for one second on each
loop. Every x seconds, the infinite loop calls a function, which makes
some GDK calls. At the begin
On Dec 15, 2007 8:46 AM, Stephan Arts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having an issue with a new container widget I am writing. I have
> overridden the size_request and size_allocate methods.[0]
>
> For some reason, the children are all rendered in the top-left corner
> of the main windo
Hi guys,
I have this really dumb problem, but I can´t get my head around it. My
program should do the following:
- When a button is pressed, a specific playlist[m3u]-file should be
opened in the media player.
Sure, the first part is to add a callback for the buttons, but how do I
open the fi
On Thursday 13 December 2007 08:28, Dan H wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:26:25 -0700
> Michael L Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > GTKmm is based on some very nice C++ abstractions around pointers,
> > providing many of the same benefits as any managed language with
> > pure C++. They are cal
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 15:19, Dan H wrote:
> Jon Harrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My recommendation is to choose a garbage collected language for GUI
> > work as it makes everything so much easier. Lots of GCd languages
> > have GTK bindings these days.
>
> Just for the record, garbage
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> Michael McCann wrote:
>
>> Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
>>
>>> Don't use gdk in the CPU-intensive function:
>>>
>> Unfortunately, the GDK calls _are_ what is CPU-intensive. I believe the
>> gdk_pixbuf_get_from_drawable() call is the most intensive. None of m
Michael McCann wrote:
> Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
>> Don't use gdk in the CPU-intensive function:
> Unfortunately, the GDK calls _are_ what is CPU-intensive. I believe the
> gdk_pixbuf_get_from_drawable() call is the most intensive. None of my
> "regular" code is CPU-intensive.
How large is the
Michael R. Head wrote:
> I'll break protocol and reply to my own message _again_...
>
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 19:05 -0500, Michael R. Head wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 18:46 -0500, Michael McCann wrote:
>>
>>> Ahh, ok. How else can I accomplish my goal, then? I need to give GTK the
>>
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> Michael McCann wrote:
>
>> Michael R. Head wrote:
>>
>>> Does your special function take time to do its job? If so, then that
>>> would be why. For example:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> while(1) {
>>> gdk_threads_enter();
>>> sleep(1)
>>> gdk_threads_leave();
>>> sleep(10)
>>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 07:05:18PM -0500, Michael McCann wrote:
> Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> > Michael McCann wrote:
> >> Michael R. Head wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 17:14 -0500, Michael R. Head wrote:
> >>>
> I assume you meant
>
> g_threads_init();
> gdk_threads_
Michael McCann wrote:
> Michael R. Head wrote:
>> Does your special function take time to do its job? If so, then that
>> would be why. For example:
>>
>> ...
>> while(1) {
>> gdk_threads_enter();
>> sleep(1)
>> gdk_threads_leave();
>> sleep(10)
>> };
>> ...
>>
>> you'd freeze your app for a second
I'll break protocol and reply to my own message _again_...
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 19:05 -0500, Michael R. Head wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 18:46 -0500, Michael McCann wrote:
> >
> > Ahh, ok. How else can I accomplish my goal, then? I need to give GTK the
> > lock, as I'm calling GDK from anoth
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 18:46 -0500, Michael McCann wrote:
>
> Ahh, ok. How else can I accomplish my goal, then? I need to give GTK the
> lock, as I'm calling GDK from another function not in the main GTK loop.
> I tried leaving out gdk_threads_enter()/leave() in the CPU-intensive
> function, bu
Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> Michael McCann wrote:
>> Michael R. Head wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 17:14 -0500, Michael R. Head wrote:
>>>
I assume you meant
g_threads_init();
gdk_threads_init();
gtk_init();
gdk_threads_enter();
gtk_main()
Michael McCann wrote:
> Michael R. Head wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 17:14 -0500, Michael R. Head wrote:
>>
>>> I assume you meant
>>>
>>> g_threads_init();
>>> gdk_threads_init();
>>> gtk_init();
>>>
>>> gdk_threads_enter();
>>> gtk_main();
>>> gdk_threads_leave(
Michael R. Head wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 17:14 -0500, Michael R. Head wrote:
>
>> I assume you meant
>>
>> g_threads_init();
>> gdk_threads_init();
>> gtk_init();
>>
>> gdk_threads_enter();
>> gtk_main();
>> gdk_threads_leave();
>>
>> right?
>>
Yes, that i
Thanks yet again to all for your help with this thread!
and special thanks to John, Nicola, Dan, Gian, Lance and Reed for
yesterdays posts.
This is awesome!
I was inspired by Göran's advice to promote selling code not software.
I had an idea for the project name yesterday so I registered a cou
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 17:14 -0500, Michael R. Head wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 16:45 -0500, Michael McCann wrote:
> > I've got a multithreaded GTK application. One thread runs gtk_main():
> >
> > gtk_threads_enter();
> > gtk_main();
> > gtk_threads_leave();
>
> I assume you meant
>
>
>
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 20:52 +0800, Binary Chen wrote:
> I know it is a feature of window manager, but is there any portable way
> in GTK+ to do this?
In C...
gtk_window_set_decorated(GTK_WINDOW(window), FALSE);
or Python...
window.set_decorated(False);
or Java...
windo
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 16:45 -0500, Michael McCann wrote:
> I've got a multithreaded GTK application. One thread runs gtk_main():
>
> gtk_threads_enter();
> gtk_main();
> gtk_threads_leave();
I assume you meant
g_threads_init();
gdk_threads_init();
gtk_init();
gdk_threads_e
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 04:45:50PM -0500, Michael McCann wrote:
> I've got a multithreaded GTK application. One thread runs gtk_main():
>
> gtk_threads_enter();
> gtk_main();
> gtk_threads_leave();
>
>
> The other thread is an infinite loop that sleeps for one second on each
> loop. Every x seco
I've got a multithreaded GTK application. One thread runs gtk_main():
gtk_threads_enter();
gtk_main();
gtk_threads_leave();
The other thread is an infinite loop that sleeps for one second on each
loop. Every x seconds, the infinite loop calls a function, which makes
some GDK calls. At the begin
I have not been able to post a message today. I tried three times. The
message concerned a website. The email was sent as text but contained a
hyperlink I guess that's not good. I also tried after removing the
_W_W_W but my message did not post.
I visited the gtk site to review the rules but di
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I've just started with GTK and been going through the tutorial and
> examples. My first small application is working all right but the
> following (I guess) warning keeps being written to the console:
>
> CRITICAL **: smooth_draw_box: assertion `width >= -1
26 matches
Mail list logo
