Re: g_remove

2011-02-17 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 17/02/2011 20:46, Costin Chirvasuta a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Craig Bakalian > wrote: >> Hi David and KC, >> >> The did the trick. But it is odd behavior. >> >> #include was already in my includes. > > Then g_remove must be a macro for a function in glib/gstdio.h, not std

Re: g_remove

2011-02-17 Thread David Nečas
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:46:14PM +0200, Costin Chirvasuta wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Craig Bakalian > wrote: > > Hi David and KC, > > > > The did the trick.  But it is odd behavior. > > > > #include was already in my includes. > > Then g_remove must be a macro for a function in

Re: g_remove

2011-02-17 Thread Costin Chirvasuta
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Craig Bakalian wrote: > Hi David and KC, > > The did the trick.  But it is odd behavior. > > #include was already in my includes. Then g_remove must be a macro for a function in glib/gstdio.h, not stdio.h. ___ gtk-app-

Re: g_remove

2011-02-17 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Craig Bakalian wrote: The did the trick. But it is odd behavior. It is not odd. Read David's e-mail for a full explanation. If it is still not clear, you should read the gcc man pages for warning options. ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-ap

Re: g_remove

2011-02-17 Thread Craig Bakalian
Hi David and KC, The did the trick. But it is odd behavior. #include was already in my includes. Craig Bakalian On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 02:00 +0800, KC wrote: > Try to add include > > KC > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Craig Bakalian > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have gtk and glib as in

Re: g_remove

2011-02-17 Thread David Nečas
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:45:36PM -0500, Craig Bakalian wrote: > I have gtk and glib as includes? Am I missing something? Yes, on Unix the g_-wrappers are often just macros resolving to the underlying system function. So you need to #include to get the real declarations (dunno why it's not d

Re: g_remove

2011-02-17 Thread Craig Bakalian
Hi, I have gtk and glib as includes? Am I missing something? If there wasn't the right include, the build would fail, further, the function wouldn't remove the file. Craig Bakalian On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 12:29 +, James Morris wrote: > On 17 February 2011 12:27, Craig Bakalian wrote: > > H

Re: Viewport diagonal scrolling redraw

2011-02-17 Thread rendaw
  On February 16, 2011 at 12:45 PM jcup...@gmail.com wrote: > On 16 February 2011 04:48, Rendaw wrote: > > As a side note, does gdk_window_process_updates() preserve mouse motion > > events when the MOTION_HINT mask is set?  I also had motion event queuing > > problems (I would stop moving the

Re: g_remove

2011-02-17 Thread James Morris
On 17 February 2011 12:27, Craig Bakalian wrote: > Hi, > > I am using g_remove to remove some temporary files from the /tmp folder. > It is working as expected.  Yet, gcc is complaining that I am making an > implicit declaration.  What is up with this? You've not #include-ed the necessary files?

g_remove

2011-02-17 Thread Craig Bakalian
Hi, I am using g_remove to remove some temporary files from the /tmp folder. It is working as expected. Yet, gcc is complaining that I am making an implicit declaration. What is up with this? Craig Bakalian ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app