Re: Compiling for Windows [Was: argv revisited]

2016-05-06 Thread tito-wolit
On 05/06/2016 09:27 PM, Andrew Robinson wrote: I'm sorry for that. One of my biggest flaws in human relations is detecting when someone is being ironic, sarcastic, or is just joking around, and when they are being serious. I would think both list would be interested in knowing what is

Re[5]: Compiling for Windows [Was: argv revisited]

2016-05-06 Thread Andrew Robinson
I'm sorry for that. One of my biggest flaws in human relations is detecting when someone is being ironic, sarcastic, or is just joking around, and when they are being serious. I would think both list would be interested in knowing what is required of their projects by the lawyers at GTK. This is

Re: Compiling for Windows [Was: argv revisited]

2016-05-06 Thread Florian Pelz
On 05/06/2016 07:01 PM, Lucas Levrel wrote: > Le 5 mai 2016, Andrew Robinson a écrit : >> 1) Because there are between 40 to 120Mb worth of libraries or their >> dependencies I would have to post on my website. > > It's not clear to me whether one has to distribute GTK if it's linked >

Re[4]: Compiling for Windows [Was: argv revisited]

2016-05-06 Thread Lucas Levrel
OK. I understand your mileage is very different from mine. Remember, I'm just a GTK user (this is GTK *app devel* list, not GTK devel list). Just a few remarks before I answer your other mail: Le 5 mai 2016, Andrew Robinson a écrit : 1) Because there are between 40 to 120Mb worth of libraries