On 10/6/05, Nikolaj Kiær Thygesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... and after a number of years developing phones for the low-end
> market I'm very much used to the low-resource situation :o) I feel a slight
> discomfort from not checking pointer return values, but if it's to no avail
> t
t old-fashioned.
br - N :o)
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Cupitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. oktober 2005 00:25
Til: Nikolaj Kiær Thygesen
Cc: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Emne: Re: Failure to allocate gtk object
On 10/5/05, Nikolaj Kiær Thygesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
On 10/5/05, Nikolaj Kiær Thygesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a quickie... What happens if the gtk_*_new() function fails to
> allocate memory for a widget??? From looking at sources I'm under the
> impression that the program will simply exit, but, if so, is there any way of
> keeping
Hey list
Just a quickie... What happens if the gtk_*_new() function fails to
allocate memory for a widget??? From looking at sources I'm under the
impression that the program will simply exit, but, if so, is there any way of
keeping it afloat and reveive a NULL-pointer-return instead???
