On Thursday 05 April 2007 00:47, Iain * wrote:
On 4/4/07, Chris Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. My question is, how many times (and when) do I have to call it?
Once when you've finished with it
In the context of his original question, that is not right. His original
question
Hi, I hope this is the correct ML to ask something about glib.
I'm creating a GIOChannel with g_io_channel_unix_new() and installing it
as a source with g_io_add_watch(). Everything works, but I don't know
if/how am I suppose to cleanup the things after the file descriptor closes.
In the
On 4/4/07, Alberto Mardegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But according to the docs, g_io_channel_unix_new() creates the channel
with a reference count set to 1, so I guess we need a g_object_unref()
somewhere.
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/glib/glib-IO-Channels.html#g-io-channel-unref
ext Iain * wrote:
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/glib/glib-IO-Channels.html#g-io-channel-unref
perhaps?
Sure. My question is, how many times (and when) do I have to call it?
--
http://www.mardy.it -- Geek in un lingua international!
On 4/4/07, Alberto Mardegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext Iain * wrote:
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/glib/glib-IO-Channels.html#g-io-channel-unref
perhaps?
Sure. My question is, how many times (and when) do I have to call it?
Once when you've finished with it
iain
ext Iain * wrote:
On 4/4/07, Alberto Mardegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. My question is, how many times (and when) do I have to call it?
Once when you've finished with it
So I may assume that the flow I wrote in my first mail is correct (apart
obviously substituting g_object_unref()
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 13:49, Iain * wrote:
On 4/4/07, Alberto Mardegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext Iain * wrote:
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/glib/glib-IO-Channels.html#g-io-
channel-unref
perhaps?
Sure. My question is, how many times (and when) do I have to call
On 4/4/07, Chris Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. My question is, how many times (and when) do I have to call it?
Once when you've finished with it
In the context of his original question, that is not right. His original
question was whether the callback returning FALSE avoids the
