Re: GTK+ CVS access FAQ out of date

2007-04-14 Thread Claudio Saavedra
Francesco, El Mon, 09-04-2007 a las 16:08 +0200, Francesco Montorsi escribió: Hi, the only document I could find for checking out the CVS repo of GTK+ is this: http://www.gtk.org/faq/#AEN325 and it seems out of date since if I follow the istructions I get: [EMAIL

GTK+ CVS access FAQ out of date

2007-04-09 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Hi, the only document I could find for checking out the CVS repo of GTK+ is this: http://www.gtk.org/faq/#AEN325 and it seems out of date since if I follow the istructions I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work$ CVSROOT=':pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnome' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work$ export

Re: GTK+ CVS access FAQ out of date

2007-04-09 Thread Tristan Van Berkom
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 16:08 +0200, Francesco Montorsi wrote: Hi, the only document I could find for checking out the CVS repo of GTK+ is this: http://www.gtk.org/faq/#AEN325 and it seems out of date since if I follow the istructions I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work$

Re: GTK+ CVS access FAQ out of date

2007-04-09 Thread Yeti
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:08:53PM +0200, Francesco Montorsi wrote: the only document I could find for checking out the CVS repo of GTK+ is this: http://www.gtk.org/faq/#AEN325 and it seems out of date since if I follow the istructions I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work$

Re: GTK+ CVS access FAQ out of date

2007-04-09 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Hi, Tristan Van Berkom ha scritto: IIRC it was discontinued recently (the cvs repo /was/ around for a few months following the migration though). http://live.gnome.org/SubversionFAQ thanks! it would be nice to update also the FAQ on the www.gtk.org website :) Francesco --

Re: GTK+ CVS access FAQ out of date

2007-04-09 Thread Reed Hedges
Francesco Montorsi wrote: Hi, Tristan Van Berkom ha scritto: IIRC it was discontinued recently (the cvs repo /was/ around for a few months following the migration though). http://live.gnome.org/SubversionFAQ thanks! it would be nice to update also the FAQ on the www. Yup. I put a bug