On 6/29/06, David Nečas (Yeti) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GtkTreeView (which, despite its name, can do
> non-trees too).
A list is also a tree, that's why it handles it well. Perhaps we
should have a generalized GtkGraphView to handle all kinds of graphs?
;)
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:07:41AM +0200, simon kendall wrote:
> Anyway, in gtk.org/tutorial, the only thing on TreeViews seem to
> be under Undocumented Widgets.
The Tree View Tutorial is actually at
http://scentric.net/tutorial/
> I suppose I'll check up on CLists and GtkListStore, thanks
On 6/29/06, "John Coppens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:50:41 -0300
> From: John Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Now, about gtk_tree's
> To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:26:12 +0200
"simon kendall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> So, following the advice of converting the lists to trees, I started
> changing all the functions into tree-oriented ones. I have a book on
> the subject, and I read the section on trees as there is no
> document
Hi,
So, following the advice of converting the lists to trees, I started
changing all the functions into tree-oriented ones. I have a book on
the subject, and I read the section on trees as there is no
documentation on gtk.org. Now, for every tree-related function I write
my compiler says it's unde
