On 10/07/2011 11:09 AM, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 12:48 +0100, jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Ooop, thanks. I hadn't realised but I'd not updated the version on the
>> website for a while. I've put my current one up now and it includes a
>> thing for g_type_add_interface_static(),
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 18:07 +, Thomas Harty wrote:
> I'll see if I can narrow down exactly what's causing this...
Still, looks like you're pretty close to a good suppression file.
Where should we install it?
/usr/share/suppression/glib.sup
/usr/share/suppression/gtk.sup
er 2011 17:14
To: Thomas Harty
Cc: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Valgrind questions
Hi Tom,
On 23 November 2011 15:21, Thomas Harty wrote:
> any suggestions for what's causing this leak report and the best way to
> suppress it?
That looks like a gtk/gtkmm bug to me,
Hi Tom,
On 23 November 2011 15:21, Thomas Harty wrote:
> any suggestions for what's causing this leak report and the best way to
> suppress it?
That looks like a gtk/gtkmm bug to me, but it's hard to tell without
some context. Could you make a tiny test program which shows this
behaviour?
It a
se.cc:194)
any suggestions for what's causing this leak report and the best way to
suppress it?
Tom
From: Thomas Harty
Sent: 23 November 2011 15:20
To: Andrew Cowie; gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Subject: RE: Valgrind questions
I've been updating the supp
devel-list-boun...@gnome.org] on behalf of Andrew Cowie
[and...@operationaldynamics.com]
Sent: 07 October 2011 10:09
To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Valgrind questions
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 12:48 +0100, jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ooop, thanks. I hadn't realised but I'd
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 12:48 +0100, jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ooop, thanks. I hadn't realised but I'd not updated the version on the
> website for a while. I've put my current one up now and it includes a
> thing for g_type_add_interface_static(), as you also found.
Might it be a good idea to put
com [jcup...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 September 2011 08:54
To: Thomas Harty
Cc: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Valgrind questions
I posted this the last time this subject came up (twice last year, I
think), but I made this valgrind suppression file for my project:
http://www.vips.ecs.soto
Hi Tom,
On 20 September 2011 11:38, Thomas Harty wrote:
> Running like that, I still get quite a few leaks detected by valgrind. Some
> of them are created by g_type_add_interface_static, which looks like another
> type_init leak, which we can safely ignore. So, I've added the following to
> t
I posted this the last time this subject came up (twice last year, I
think), but I made this valgrind suppression file for my project:
http://www.vips.ecs.soton.ac.uk/development/nip2.supp
Run with:
$ export G_DEBUG=gc-friendly
This makes Glib clear certain memory areas after using the
Dear all,
I've been trying to get clear on exactly what the situation between Gtk+ and
Valgrind is. There is a fair amount of information out there, but it's pretty
scattered and mainly fairly old, so it'd be good to get it all in one place.
As far as I understand it, the situation is that memo
11 matches
Mail list logo
