I've found these useful:
http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/porting/
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/gtk-changes-2-0.html
http://gtkglext.sourceforge.net/reference/gtkglext/
http://inigo.katxi.org/docs/Python2/pygtk-faq.html#2.3
-> Pete
---
Is there any porting guide or migration guide for gtk-1.2 -> gtk 2.0 ?
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Madeningly, it is not included with Fedora, or Mandrake. Fortunately,
on Mandrake at least, it is easy to install with urpmi (assuming
correct repositories are set up). I assume it can also easily be
installed on Fedora with yum.
Chris Anderson
On 7/7/05, Ken Siersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
David Necas (Yeti) wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:37:03PM -0400, David Morse wrote:
What's up with gtkglarea? The version in Fedora Core 4 has its most
recent ChangeLog entry in 2002. The author's page for it is 404.
GtkGLArea is effectively dead. GtkGLExt is a much better
rep
Gee, I just spent months porting the 1.2 dependent OpenEV application to
gtk2. The lackadaisical 'why don't you just use 2.0' illustrates the
problem nicely. gtk2 may not have been a huge change over 1.2, but more
problematic was the corresponding pygtk change, throw in a few other
gtk1.2 depend
Sorry! I think it was on another mailing list! However, why don't you
use GTK 2.0?
On 7/7/05, André Pedralho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we don't have support to GTK 1.2, do we? Why don't you use the GTK
> 2.0??
>
> On 7/7/05, David Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/7/05, David
I think we don't have support to GTK 1.2, do we? Why don't you use the GTK 2.0??
On 7/7/05, David Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/7/05, David Necas (Yeti) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:37:03PM -0400, David Morse wrote:
> > > What's up with gtkglarea? The versio
On 7/7/05, David Necas (Yeti) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:37:03PM -0400, David Morse wrote:
> > What's up with gtkglarea? The version in Fedora Core 4 has its most
> > recent ChangeLog entry in 2002. The author's page for it is 404.
>
> GtkGLArea is effectively dead.
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:37:03PM -0400, David Morse wrote:
> What's up with gtkglarea? The version in Fedora Core 4 has its most
> recent ChangeLog entry in 2002. The author's page for it is 404.
GtkGLArea is effectively dead. GtkGLExt is a much better
replacement for Gtk+2 apps.
> Yet its p
What's up with gtkglarea? The version in Fedora Core 4 has its most
recent ChangeLog entry in 2002. The author's page for it is 404. Yet
its popular enough to be in every distro.
I thought I'd test compatibility of my app with Fedora Core 4. The
compile barfs on this source code (which is ripp
10 matches
Mail list logo