Re: combo rant

2005-11-26 Thread Gus Koppel
control H wrote: Well, I must admit that I haven't used Windows more than occasionaly for the last three or four years, but the last time I checked, Windows combo box was much _worse_ than GTK+'s, in my opinion. You would often get a five-line combo where you'd have to scroll like hell

Re: combo rant

2005-11-26 Thread Freddie Unpenstein
It is the trade-off of the policy that the selected item is under the pointer in the just shown popup, period. I think it is generally good, but this is an example of where it shows its drawbacks. However, for the sake of UI consistency, I believe it should _not_ be changed. I.e. it be under

Re: combo rant

2005-11-26 Thread Paul Pogonyshev
David Necas (Yeti) wrote: On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:26:58PM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote: It is the trade-off of the policy that the selected item is under the pointer in the just shown popup, period. I think it is generally good, but this is an example of where it shows its

Re: combo rant

2005-11-26 Thread Greg Breland
I am pretty negative about the combo as a control, not just the GTK combo. Widget sets don't have much of a choice but to include it since it's considered a core control, but as a developer, I try to avoid it if I can. As has been discussed previously, the problem with the combo as a control is

Re: combo rant

2005-11-25 Thread control H
[snip] To be fair, I've worked with combo controls from at least 4 different widget sets and they all were horrible. Win32, GTK, Web, Borland, Java, they all suck. I think as a control, the combo control is just a bad concept. I'm not that negative about a combo control. After all, a good

Re: combo rant

2005-11-25 Thread Paul Pogonyshev
control H wrote: [snip] To be fair, I've worked with combo controls from at least 4 different widget sets and they all were horrible. Win32, GTK, Web, Borland, Java, they all suck. I think as a control, the combo control is just a bad concept. I'm not that negative about a combo

Re: combo rant

2005-11-25 Thread control H
Well, I must admit that I haven't used Windows more than occasionaly for the last three or four years, but the last time I checked, Windows combo box was much _worse_ than GTK+'s, in my opinion. You would often get a five-line combo where you'd have to scroll like hell to skip all those 200

Re: combo rant

2005-11-25 Thread Paul Pogonyshev
control H wrote: I'm not saying GTK+'s combo is perfect, but I think it is generally better than anything else I've seen. At least it always uses all the screen space it has. But this is one of my other objections: it merely _tries_ to use all the screen space available. It draws the

combo rant

2005-11-23 Thread control H
[I already posted this to the gtk-list, I'm not sure which list I should use] I'll start with apologies for upcoming rant. In general I like Gtk: I'm programming with it for a couple of years now and it's easy to learn, reasonably fast, has many bindings, runs on windows, and is highly themable.

Re: combo rant

2005-11-23 Thread Greg Breland
My current project requires that I write wrappers around all common GTK and Win32 .NET controls to give them a common functionality set. Sort of like what wxWindows would do but much much more simple with much less functionality. I mention this because with the exception of the GtkComboBox