I am having treeview with visible headers.
What I need to do is to remove GTK_CAN_FOCUS flag from the header button
widgets
(GTK_WIDGET_UNSET_FLAGS(view, GTK_CAN_FOCUS)) .
My problem is that I don't know how to access header widget(s).
Is this possible ?
TIA,
Miroslav Rajcic
I am trying to make my toolbar (with tool buttons) not to receive focus when
Tab is used to move focus along the window widgets.
I've tried to call
GTK_WIDGET_UNSET_FLAGS(widget, GTK_CAN_FOCUS);
to both toolbar widget and every single tool button, but it doesn't seem to
work.
Toolbar still gets
how i can grub focus to my program.
i what to write a small xlocker.
#include gtk/gtk.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
gboolean delete_event(GtkWidget* widget, GdkEvent* event, gpointer data)
{
fprintf(stderr,delete event\n);
return TRUE;
}
gboolean focus_in_event (GtkWidget
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 18:29:42 +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:22:50 +0100, Yang Hong wrote:
...
I wan to compile a static gtk app, then it can run in a everiment
without gtk libs.
[...]
GNU/Linux really is not suitable
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 13:30 +0100, Philippe De Swert wrote:
PS: Is there a gtkhtml related list? I could not find one, and it might be
good to discuss this matter further with the relevant developers/users,
without having to contact them personally.
Thanks!
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 13:30 +0100, Philippe De Swert wrote:
PS: Is there a gtkhtml related list? I could not find one, and it might be
good to discuss this matter further with the relevant developers/users,
without having to contact them personally.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| If somebody else feels like having a go, please do, and keep the list
| informed. It should be prettty obvious, from a high-level point of
| view, what to do. The devil is in the details. Mail me if you want the
| diffs of how far I got in an
Alexis S. L. Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+static gchar *
+write_to_temp_file (const gchar *contents,
+ gsize length,
nitpick
gssize to be consistent with g_file_replace?
/nitpick
I have changed it, but I don't see why it
matters. write_to_temp_file() is not called
