Bug 308020: GOption - G_ARG_CALLBACK should allow none arg callback

2005-06-16 Thread open.list
In goption.c, the function that the program gives to G_OPTION_ARG_CALLBACK doesn't get called when no argument is given with the switch. This is a undesired effect because you can't use G_ARG_CALLBACK for options that don't have an arguments (ie. like a callback for a G_OPTION_ARG_NONE). I made a p

How to compile on OS X with *alternate* freetype?

2005-06-16 Thread Tom Loredo
Hi folks- I posted this on the main list yesterday, but since there hasn't been even a nibble in the last 24 hours, I thought I'd check with the experts on the source/config. Quick version: Is there a way to get GTK (and PyGTK) to build on OS X against freetype in /usr/local rather than Apple's

Re: GNOME 2.11/2.12 targeting GTK+ 2.8 (ie cairo based)

2005-06-16 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 17:47 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le jeudi 16 juin 2005 à 16:13 +0100, Mark McLoughlin a écrit : > > > Is it ok if nautilus depends on glib 2.8 for this? This doesn't mean we > > > have to use gtk+ 2.8, gtk+ 2.6 works fine with glib 2.8. > > > > > > Its a bit strange as glib

Re: GNOME 2.11/2.12 targeting GTK+ 2.8 (ie cairo based)

2005-06-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 16 juin 2005 à 16:13 +0100, Mark McLoughlin a écrit : > > Is it ok if nautilus depends on glib 2.8 for this? This doesn't mean we > > have to use gtk+ 2.8, gtk+ 2.6 works fine with glib 2.8. > > > > Its a bit strange as glib and gtk+ have historically released very much > > in lockstep. H

Re: GNOME 2.11/2.12 targeting GTK+ 2.8 (ie cairo based)

2005-06-16 Thread Mark McLoughlin
Hey, This thread has just petered out, but Alex still needs an answer. On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 14:59 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 15:53 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 13:50 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > > > - The benefit of being

Re: annoying glib licencing stuff

2005-06-16 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 10:00 +0200, Mathieu Lacage wrote: > I understand that this might not be high on the todo list of the gtk+ > developers but I would appreciate an answer to that email. Sorry, GUADEC interfered... > regards, > Mathieu > > On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 13:57 +0200, Mathieu Lacage wro

Re: GNOME 2.11/2.12 targeting GTK+ 2.8 (ie cairo based)

2005-06-16 Thread Christof Petig
[Sebastien: I rewrote this letter to be of interest to other people, too. Consider my issues as closed/known.] I wrote: > Where should I file/report bugs? > > Firefox stopped showing text (no text anywhere, no menus, ...) > and gives lots of > > (Gecko:6649): Pango-CRITICAL **: pango_cairo_show_

Re: annoying glib licencing stuff

2005-06-16 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 10:00 +0200, Mathieu Lacage wrote: > I understand that this might not be high on the todo list of the gtk+ > developers but I would appreciate an answer to that email. Most of the initial glib 1.x documentation was written by me, plus Sebastian Wilhelmi wrote the Threads sect

Re: annoying glib licencing stuff

2005-06-16 Thread Mathieu Lacage
I understand that this might not be high on the todo list of the gtk+ developers but I would appreciate an answer to that email. regards, Mathieu On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 13:57 +0200, Mathieu Lacage wrote: > On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 09:49 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > The problem with making the li