Re: Glib Object Caching

2006-09-26 Thread Kaustubh Atrawalkar
Ok. But was there any approaches taken before like the object's lifetime prediction or some kind of prefetching? If it is done how much it can be beneficial? The aim is to optimize glib's memory performance in both usage and time complexity. Tim Janik wrote: > On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Kaustubh Atra

Re: custom widget

2006-09-26 Thread Owen Taylor
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 19:08 -0700, Mark Richardson wrote: > Sorry about posting in the gtk dev area, but this is borderline app > dev/gtk dev. > > Anyway, I'm making a custom widget, and when I try to create a > signal... > signals[MOVE_CURSOR]=g_signal_new("move_cursor", > G_OBJECT_CLASS_TYPE(go

custom widget

2006-09-26 Thread Mark Richardson
Sorry about posting in the gtk dev area, but this is borderline app dev/gtk dev.   Anyway, I'm making a custom widget, and when I try to create a signal... signals[MOVE_CURSOR]=g_signal_new("move_cursor", G_OBJECT_CLASS_TYPE(gobject_class), G_SIGNAL_RUN_LAS | G_SIGNAL_ACTION, G_STRUCT_OFFSET (Gt

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-26 Thread Hans Petter Jansson
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 13:14 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 11:40 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > > hm, in your initial proposal, you said that apps don't currently have > > control > > over whether they want to use/care about threading or not. so, are you > > planning for a way

Re: Glib Object Caching

2006-09-26 Thread Tim Janik
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Kaustubh Atrawalkar wrote: > Hi > > Is there any object caching mechanism in glib? The paper given in the > gslice.c header part says the there is object caching mechanism. But i > wonder hows exactly it is done? While calling g_slice_alloc function > there is just a request o

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-26 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 09:40 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > > >>Indeed, i made daily "cvs update" and rebuilt GTK from scratch for the >>whole past week, before 2.10.4 was released, but it seems this wasn't >>enough. > > > You should consider to do this for t

Glib Object Caching

2006-09-26 Thread Kaustubh Atrawalkar
Hi Is there any object caching mechanism in glib? The paper given in the gslice.c header part says the there is object caching mechanism. But i wonder hows exactly it is done? While calling g_slice_alloc function there is just a request of memory size. It does not mention anything about the ob

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-26 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 09:40 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > Indeed, i made daily "cvs update" and rebuilt GTK from scratch for the > whole past week, before 2.10.4 was released, but it seems this wasn't > enough. You should consider to do this for the stable branch on a regular basis.

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-26 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Matthias Clasen wrote: > On 9/25/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome >> Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK for use in the >> debian-installer. >> Is there a way to check if the DirctFB back

Re: [GLIB] Routines that call g_return_if_fail() etc hang/crash [WinXP]

2006-09-26 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Olumide writes: > How can I using get the stack trace sysinternals's Process Explorer > (I've downloaded it). The Process Explorer stack trace, to the best of my knowledge, is fully reliable only for code that includes Microsoft-style debugging information. gcc-compiled code doesn't. Otherwise