On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 23:58 +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 16:59 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > I'm still not sure why gstreamer needs to run its own mainloop in its
> > thread though. If its async, then it should be able to use the default
> > mainloop. Is it bec
Hi
The directfb backend was eventualy fixed in both trunk and gtk-2-10 (see
latest commits from mike emmel and loic minier), one more minor patch is
pending (#437379) but should be committed soon.
I made sure gtk-2-10 builds with dfb backend enabled, is there something
else i must do to ensure
On 5/10/07, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more thing: i often need to disturb mike or loic to get patches
> cheched in, may i get write access to gnome's svn repo to manage the
> directfb backend?
Check this out:
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/policies/accounts/requesting.htm
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 22:43, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> [The row_deleted signal always comes from the model, which means "this
> row is really gone". Why would callers later need to unref that
> row-which-is-already-gone? The model will have freed the row's
> resources by then...]
A whil
Hi Alex,
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 09:41 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> So, if you were to implement gstreamer sinks and sources for gvfs, an
> api like:
> gssize g_input_stream_read (GInputStream *stream,
> void *buffer,
>
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:01:20PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Wouldn't it make more sense to introduce a new signal "row-delete" and
> use that instead of changing the semantics of "row-deleted"? If that
> would have been done in the first place, then you wouldn't have said
> inconsistency now.
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:43:20PM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> Is there a description of when/how a model should implement
> ref/unref_node? I recall asking this to JRB many times, but the
> semantics were never completely clear to me.
There are no clear rules for this, actually. Most
Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> ext Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>> I think it would be much better for everyone if we get GtkBuilder done
>> now and not evolve on libglade, my concern here is mostly based on
>> the diverse ways in which you can represent widgets in xml: libglade
>> might do it one way, Gtk
I've made a change to pango-layout.c. When fitting text in a line, the
current algorithm does a linear search to find the break. I thought that
performance would be further increased by storing character width
cumulatively (rather than differentially) so that a binary search could be
performed.
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 16:34 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
[excellent analysis snipped]
> so i'd say that tap-and-hold expiration is one of the rarer cases, where
> one should always use GDK_CURRENT_TIME for menu popups. that in turn means
> there's no point in carrying across a time stamp (which would b
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 12:15 +0200, Kristian Rietveld wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 07:47:25PM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> > You have two tap-and-hold actions: pop up a menu and pop up a tooltip
> > with extra info. Should those have the same "I'm armed" animations?
>
> Yes, I would
Poked by arc (Alberto Ruiz) on IRC, here is a description of the
(totally homegrown and not really meant to be used as such by others)
mechanism I use to build GTK+ etc.
The top-level script, one for each package and version, has a name
like gtk+-2.10.11.make. Here is that gtk+-2.10.11.make script
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 17:04 +0200, Kristian Rietveld wrote:
> There are no clear rules for this, actually. Most simple models don't
> have a real use for this. The filter and sort models both use this
> mechanism to keep track of which levels to cache and monitor. Models
> which reference exter
Heya,
It doesn't seem possible to achieve the following in GTK+:
- widget accepts GDK_ACTION_COPY and GDK_ACTION_MOVE, but widget has a
*default* action of GDK_ACTION_MOVE (not copy)
I'm trying to get to the following behaviour in Totem:
- dnd on the video canvas defaults to "link" which would cl
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 12:20 -0700, David Moffatt wrote:
> So is that a request for a bribe? Give me cool enough swag and I will
> let your feature in. :-)
It was worth a try :)
Federico
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http:
Since tml is posting his Win32 build scripts, I figured I'd also mention
that I started a wiki page on live.gnome.org about cross-compiling GTK
for Win32 from Linux, and I think arc and muntyan have also updated it
further.
http://live.gnome.org/Cross_compiling_GTK%2B_for_Win32
I was previously m
For people's information, this is bug #372220
(http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372220) in Totem.
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 01:10 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Heya,
>
> It doesn't seem possible to achieve the following in GTK+:
> - widget accepts GDK_ACTION_COPY and GDK_ACTION_MOVE, but wi
17 matches
Mail list logo
