On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 02:46:22AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
John Coppens writes:
If I'm not mistaken (I don't use windows), look at the g_io functions, I
believe they are portable to Windows too. There may be a problem with the
names of the devices (COM1: vs /dev/ttyS0) or so, but
Hi list,...
...im sorry if i missunderstand something...
Am 14.05.2007 19:53:44 schrieb(en) Michelle Konzack:
Hello *,
I am new on this list, but have already codes some VERY simple admin
GUI's... Now I have a bigger problem/Application which need definitiv
multithreading since it must poll
Pavel A. da Mek wrote:
When I want to use serial ports, shall I write separate code for Windows and
for Linux, or is there some library function which would allow to do it in
the platform independent way?
I have written portable code for this with timeouts for read and write
operations.
On Monday 14 May 2007 20:49, Pavel A. da Mek wrote:
When I want to use serial ports, shall I write separate code for Windows
and for Linux, or is there some library function which would allow to do it
in the platform independent way?
I hit the same problem in 2004, and I wrote an abstraction
Well, it's possible to change the language in Firefox and in a lot of other
programs.
I don't mind having to restart the program to do it.
I just don't want to have to change the system's local language to do it.
I know that gettext is mostly used for internationalisation. However, I have
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:30:14PM +0200, John Zoidberg wrote:
Well, it's possible to change the language in Firefox and in a lot of other
programs.
That does not make it a good idea.
Firefox is designed for Microsoft Windows -- where one had
to reinstall the system it to switch languages.
Hello,
i'd like to hide my top level window, when user minimizes it. I mean, i
don't want the window to be in the task bar - i want to hide it (not
minimize it). Can someone help me with this?
I've already managed to do that when user closes the window - but with
this, i just can't do it. I
Perhaps we should all put in some links - this would be beneficial for
everybody I think (not all are still active/useful):
http://dev.investorsidekick.com/begtkextra/
http://libbit.sf.net/
http://www.curlyankles.com/
http://kornelix.squarespace.com/utilities/
Hello,
could anyone tell me how can I hide window, when user minimizes it?
I tried to handle signal 'window-state-event', but when in that method i
hide window,
strange things happen - window hides, and then shows up again and it
never ends.
Any help would be appretiated.
Thanks in advance,
Hi,
In [1], Tim mentioned that the current plan was to release GTK+ 2.12
mid-June. Is this still the case or do you expect a delay? This would be
useful to know, so we can tell people that it's okay to use the new GTK+
features.
And any idea about glib 2.14? I guess if GTK+ 2.12 will be ready,
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 13:55:25 +0200 (CEST)
seems you managed to crash around the slice debugger doing realloc().
more interesting than the backtrace should actually be the
program output.
if you saw something like:
GSlice: MemChecker: attempt to
seems you managed to crash around the slice debugger doing realloc().
more interesting than the backtrace should actually be the
program output.
if you saw something like:
GSlice: MemChecker: attempt to release block with invalid size...
I saw no such output on the last ~100 lines
On Fri, 11 May 2007 13:55:25 +0200 (CEST)
Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's likely that some code portions erroneously use GSlice and thus screw
up the memory handling at some point. G_SLICE=debug-blocks is really the
recommended way to find those errors and much faster than trying
So the question is, should glib not make some sanity checking for code
that is not actually thread related (like gslice).
it does do sanity checking, it throws a big bold warning if you call
thread_init and gslice in the wrong order:
http://blogs.gnome.org/view/timj/2007/01/02/0
On Tue, 15 May 2007 16:14:26 +0200
Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, found the problem: g_thread_init() wasn't called by sshfs, and
hence the thread private data used by gslice wasn't actually thread
private.
Now I see that the mandatory use of g_thread_init() is documented, but
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
So the question is, should glib not make some sanity checking for code
that is not actually thread related (like gslice).
it does do sanity checking, it throws a big bold warning if you call
thread_init and gslice in the wrong order:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 16:14:26 +0200
Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, found the problem: g_thread_init() wasn't called by sshfs, and
hence the thread private data used by gslice wasn't actually thread
private.
Now I see that the
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
I don't understand some things however, so here are some questions to glib
devs:
1) Why the crash didn't occur when using G_SLICE=always-malloc?
Because only the gslice code used thread private data, the malloc()
code is thread safe without
Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
I don't understand some things however, so here are some questions to glib
devs:
1) Why the crash didn't occur when using G_SLICE=always-malloc?
IANA glib dev.
I believe when G_SLICE=always-malloc, the g_slice allocators are
simplified to something like:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
And this is perfectly possible if program is using the pthread API,
while using glib for hash tables, etc.
if you use the pthread API without calling g_thread_init(), you're getting
yourself into trouble. don't do that, glib can't possibly work
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:08:10AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
It'd be useful to know how many more people are needed to have things
working more smoothly. Let's talk about full-time people: would 2 people
be enough? Or do we need much more than 2, like 8 full-time developers?
This is the kind
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 22:29 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:08:10AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
[...]
Some comparison...
http://www.trolltech.com/company
Trolltech is a software company with two product lines: Qt and Qtopia.
We currently have 200 employees working at
Hi,
Le mardi 15 mai 2007, à 16:53 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
Its been clearly stated that core maintainers are whats lacking, people
that can be trusted to review large patches, do refactoring work and
call shots so to speak, in my own personal opinion I think gtk+ could do
fine with
Hi,
Vincent Untz wrote:
For example, a lot of companies do have an interest in GTK+ but are not
actively participating upstream. I've been in contact with some of them
to see if they could get some of their developers to freely work on
upstream as part of their job. People have been open
On Wed, 16 May 2007 04:13:18 +0200
Salvatore De Paolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to catch the release button event from a widget using a
GtkEventBox. After i create the GtkEventBox i use gtk_widget_set_events to
set masks in this way:
25 matches
Mail list logo
