(A short note addressed to those maintaining the .msc files
to build glib/gtk using MSVC):
nmake ... clean also deletes the .symbols files
(at least on my Windows XP system).
(apologies if this is already known)
Bill Meier
___
gtk-devel-list
On 13/12/2007, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 14:43 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> >> Alexander Larsson wrote:
> >>> It just adds new types and type relations you have to learn, and forces
> >>> you to remember that you have to cast
On Dec 13, 2007 1:21 PM, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't really see the need for adding symbols to the library to
> represent 0. If there is only one "flag" in each of these that matters,
> doesn't it make more sense to just have a boolean?
>
This is not adding any symbols to
Hi,
this mailing-list is about development of GTK+. Please don't ask
questions here that about developing applications with GTK+. We have
gtk-app-devel-list and gtk-list for this. Thanks.
Sven
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
Hi,
Martyn Russell wrote:
> I don't really see the need for adding symbols to the library to
> represent 0. If there is only one "flag" in each of these that matters,
> doesn't it make more sense to just have a boolean?
>
Flags are almost always preferable to booleans, compare -
gtk_box_pack_
On Dec 13, 2007 11:18 AM, Saroj Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ported X11 and Gtk with X11 support on Embedded board(arm-linux).
> The problem I am facing now is setting the fontconfig. Because I have
> fontconfig and freetype libraries for X11 and I compiled Gtk with those
> librari
Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> I just wanted to clarify though that it's not so much for technical
> reasons I suggested that we namespace a bit more carefully.
>
> For example, if we plan to never use the GAsync infrastructure for
> anything other than GIO there is a point to put it under the GIO
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 17:25 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
>> Hi all!,
>>
>> On mar, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
>>> Hey everybody,
>>>
>>> We've been doing a GIO API review in the last couple of days and
>>> here is the list of comments and issues w
13 dec 2007 kl. 12.51 skrev Alexander Larsson:
Hi,
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:48 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
>> 12 dec 2007 kl. 14.59 skrev Alexander Larsson:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
>>
>>>
A big issue is that GIO wastes namespaces massi
Hey All.
The following gives a mini tutorial on writing test programs for GLib
and Gtk+ with the new framework. We have a good number of example test
programs in SVN now and appreciate help from everyone in implementing
new tests.
First, we'll have a quick introduction into the main rationale on
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> There is no need to break the common prefix for global things:
>
> g_push_current_cancellable -> g_cancellable_push_current
> g_pop_current_cancellable -> g_cancellable_pop_current
Done.
__
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 17:25 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hi all!,
>
> On mar, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> > Hey everybody,
> >
> > We've been doing a GIO API review in the last couple of days and
> > here is the list of comments and issues we've come up with:
> >
>
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> GFile:
> ==
>
> g_mount_for_location should probably be g_file_mount_for_location
I've changed this to g_file_mount_enclosing_volume()
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnom
Hi all!,
On mar, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> We've been doing a GIO API review in the last couple of days and
> here is the list of comments and issues we've come up with:
>
I Just wanted to raise another concern I have. Besides defining enums
contain
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 12:13 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > 1. Introduce g_file_get_stable_uri() and always make g_file_get_uri()
> > return file:// URI's for local files
>
> Given the above, this is the only workable solution.
Thanks for the detailed reply; I pretty much agree with all
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 14:43 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
>> Alexander Larsson wrote:
>>> It just adds new types and type relations you have to learn, and forces
>>> you to remember that you have to cast to some common class to do things
>>> like cancelling a directory
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 14:50 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:46 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> >> Alexander Larsson wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> We've been doing
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 13:51 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> So, I don't think the current API prohibits a secure authentication
> dialog, but it would be some work to implement.
Yeah, I agree. Thanks for the detailed explanation.
David
___
gtk
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 14:43 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > It just adds new types and type relations you have to learn, and forces
> > you to remember that you have to cast to some common class to do things
> > like cancelling a directory monitor. It adds nothing us
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:46 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
>> Alexander Larsson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
Hey everybody,
We've been doing a GIO API review in the last couple of days and
here is the list of c
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 17:33 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
>> Alexander Larsson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
G*Monitor:
==
GFileMonitor -> GIOMonitorFile
GDirectoryMonitor -> GIOMonitorDirecto
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 12:05 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've looked at the GMountOperation class today and I have some security
> concerns. Basically, the way I understand how it's supposed to work is
> that if you mount something you may need to provide credentials. Also,
> I understa
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 03:46 -0800, Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:13:33 +0100 Alexander Larsson wrote:
>
> > Also, I don't think this should be in libgio itself. Its really
> > something that would be part of the unix desktop and not something
> > that makes sense on other pl
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 17:33 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> >> G*Monitor:
> >> ==
> >>
> >> GFileMonitor -> GIOMonitorFile
> >> GDirectoryMonitor -> GIOMonitorDirectory
> >>
> >> Wouldn't it ma
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 12:34 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 13.12.2007, 12:17 +0100 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
> > If we add things like GSettings to libgio (to avoid adding yet
> > more .so's) then things look even more weird. GIOSettings?
>
> Off-topic, but random though s
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:48 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> 12 dec 2007 kl. 14.59 skrev Alexander Larsson:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
>
> >
> >> A big issue is that GIO wastes namespaces massively:
> >> g_app, GAsync, g_buffered, g_cancellable, g
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:13:33 +0100 Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 01:17 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > volume://name=davidz%20data;uuid=1234/path/to/file.txt
> > /media/disk/path/to/file.txt
> Also, I don't think this should be in libgio itself. Its really
> something th
Am Donnerstag, den 13.12.2007, 12:17 +0100 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
> If we add things like GSettings to libgio (to avoid adding yet
> more .so's) then things look even more weird. GIOSettings?
Off-topic, but random though since we couldn't find a name of the
utility .so between libgobject and l
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:46 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:48 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> >> Hey everybody,
> >>
> >> We've been doing a GIO API review in the last couple of days and
> >> here is the list of comments and issues we've co
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:53 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:37 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > > >> GAsnc*-> GIOAsync*
> > > >> G*Stream -> GIOStream*
> > > >> GIcon -> GIOIcon
> > > >> G*Icon-> GIOIcon*
> > > >> GCancellable -> GIOCancella
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 01:17 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Hey Alex,
>
> I've attached some preliminary patches to introduce a new volume:// name
> space. The thinking is that g_file_get_uri() will return a persistent
> URI if a local file is on user-visible media.
>
> (Emphasis on user-visible.
Am Donnerstag, den 13.12.2007, 02:07 -0500 schrieb David Zeuthen:
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 08:01 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 13.12.2007, 01:17 -0500 schrieb David Zeuthen:
> > > There's a screenshot here showing integration into Nautilus
> > >
> > > http://people.freede
32 matches
Mail list logo
