GTK+ 2.12.5 is now available for download at:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gtk+/2.12/
gtk+-2.12.5.tar.bz2 md5sum: 588c7fb3d9ebadf4f5a1ab4c534e4db5
gtk+-2.12.5.tar.gzmd5sum: ab00ecf5a8709642d7f72d7084db05d5
This release fixes an incomplete icon cache that was
accidentally
/*MYSTERIOUS CODE [FOR ME] -- WORKS !! :-)*/
while (gtk_events_pending ())
{
g_print([.]);
gtk_main_iteration ();
}
Vijay:
Hi, all. How convinient! I was looking for it. Thanks!
I do understand the reason though. You're running a single thread program,
instruction are run in a
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:53:30 +0530
Subject: Re: GTK Progress bar: assistance pls.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Friends,
How about the idea of emitting a signal with the value of the fraction
when I want to get the progress
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:22:46 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how the change the shape and color of Gtk Button
CC: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:36:40PM +0530, Ajax John wrote:
Hi All,
I'm new to Gtk app. develoment.
Yes zhang, I realised signals wont work when I got the solution
infact, a few more pals here feel doing this in a proper threading
model gives lesser problems, even though they are not able to clearly
point out why their experience speaks for them probably.
On Thu, January 10, 2008
Shawn Amundson wrote:
Martyn,
Hi,
Just copying this to the devel list and to Tim Janik since I am not
completely sure who else is or should be involved in these decisions and
I know Tim has some insight about future plans to upgrade gtk.org.
A while back I started reworking www.gtk.org and
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 18:19 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno mar, 08/01/2008 alle 09.12 +0100, Alexander Larsson ha
scritto:
I tried to understand it before, but i just couldn't. There is this sed
call in the Makefile:
(sed -e '/^#/d'
Shawn Amundson wrote:
Martyn Russell wrote:
2. With regards to the FAQ, is there a burning need to have this in a
docbook format? Currently it is a mess and I am thinking of reforming
it, but before I do, I wonder if we should just put it completely in
HTML and as part of the website. Is
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 15:05 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
I will be posting my final review of the gtk.org pages in the coming few
weeks and I wanted people's opinions on a few things.
1. Would anyone object to putting the Windows binaries on the gtk.org
site
Hi,
Here's a quick guide for setting up GLib testing framework for your own
project. It is the result of some trial and error when integrating for
hildon widgets the test framework from current trunk. There are some
autotools related details that might not be immediately obvious for mere
mortals.
Martyn Russell wrote:
Actually, I noticed that it is on the wiki actually:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk-faq/stable/
How is it put there, just simply generated from docbook and slightly
updated to fit into the style of the pages?
It is generated from the source tarballs, files
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 11:45 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
Yeah, i think this is just a misunderstanding of what filenames and
URIs are.
[snip]
That confusion is likely to continue with gio. It's probably a good idea
to put the simple explanation in the GFile description in the
documentation.
GTK+ 2.12.5 is now available for download at:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gtk+/2.12/
gtk+-2.12.5.tar.bz2 md5sum: 588c7fb3d9ebadf4f5a1ab4c534e4db5
gtk+-2.12.5.tar.gzmd5sum: ab00ecf5a8709642d7f72d7084db05d5
This release fixes an incomplete icon cache that was
accidentally
One of the items on http://live.gnome.org/GioTodo is GIcon renderer,
so I started to think a bit about how that could look like. Alex'
pointed me at NautilusIconInfo for ideas. Looking at that, it is
somewhat similar in spirit to GtkIconInfo, with some differences:
- supports lookup by GIcon in
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:25:16AM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
I must confess, I have quite limited knowledge when it comes to our
hosting services for GNOME and GTK+ (i.e. where machines are hosted
physically and who looks after them, etc - is this information available
somewhere?). Perhaps
On 07/01/2008, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/01/2008, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/01/2008, muppet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008, at 6:46 PM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
The wait_for_signal() method process the
On Jan 9, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
muppet: I assume that it is ok to license your code under LGPL. You
are noted as author in the headers.
Perfectly fine. Thanks.
--
elysse: You dance better than some.
me: Some what?
elysse: Some asparagus.
Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:25:16AM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
I must confess, I have quite limited knowledge when it comes to our
hosting services for GNOME and GTK+ (i.e. where machines are hosted
physically and who looks after them, etc - is this information available
18 matches
Mail list logo
