Re: [TreeView] Performance of TreeView with huge lists

2008-02-11 Thread Andrew Cowie
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 22:20 +0100, Kristian Rietveld wrote: > is there any way that giving a user a list of > 100 million items is going to be useful? I would have said "no", but someone did present to me an interesting take on the matter a few weeks ago when Davyd and I were giving the GTK & GNOM

GLib 2.15.5

2008-02-11 Thread Matthias Clasen
GLib 2.15.5 is now available for download at: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/glib/2.15/ glib-2.15.5.tar.bz2 md5sum: a23f331f36ff78c8bffd37973fbfbb28 glib-2.15.5.tar.gz md5sum: 113f1e8fd72dd80a5348c4da64445537 This is the sixth development release leading up to GLib 2.16. Notes: *

Re: [TreeView] Performance of TreeView with huge lists

2008-02-11 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:06 -0500, Morten Welinder wrote: > Thorsten, try looking into ETable as used by Evolution (though not > necessarily recent versions - I last looks 5 years ago). It is not a > beauty, but it might fit your needs, Be wary of ETable though. It /is/ still used by Evolution a

Re: [TreeView] Performance of TreeView with huge lists

2008-02-11 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
On 10/02/2008, Thorsten Wilmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > thank you for gtk+ and especially gtkmm. > > I want to Display a really _huge_ List with TreeView. My result is, > that my application consumes a even more huge amount of memory -- more > than Virtual Memory is available. The r

Re: [TreeView] Performance of TreeView with huge lists

2008-02-11 Thread Morten Welinder
This comes up regularly for various large values of N. > Just as random thoughts, is there any way that giving a user a list of > 100 million items is going to be useful? If you already know that the > user will never see all of the list, why try to display it? "You do not want to do that" is no

Re: [TreeView] Performance of TreeView with huge lists

2008-02-11 Thread Kristian Rietveld
Hi, Comments inline. On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:26:01PM +0100, Thorsten Wilmer wrote: > I want to Display a really _huge_ List with TreeView. My result is, > that my application consumes a even more huge amount of memory -- more > than Virtual Memory is available. The responsiveness is also not

Re: totem-subtitle-encoding in Empathy

2008-02-11 Thread Young-Ho Cha
2008/2/11, Guillaume Desmottes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > Hello! > I'd need a charset/encoding configuration widget in Empathy. I copied > totem-subtitle-encoding.[ch] which does exactly what I mean (great > work!). > Problem is, totem is licensed under GPL and we are trying to to port > Empathy

Re: modification on treeview blocks or crashes if using g_threads

2008-02-11 Thread Martin SCHREIBER
hi! after thinking a little bit (at least a few days) about the problem, i tried modifying the data by detaching the store from the treeview before modifying the data within a thread and now it works. but that's not a real solution. if u have a suggestion why it doesnt work without detaching i'l

[TreeView] Performance of TreeView with huge lists

2008-02-11 Thread Thorsten Wilmer
Hello, thank you for gtk+ and especially gtkmm. I want to Display a really _huge_ List with TreeView. My result is, that my application consumes a even more huge amount of memory -- more than Virtual Memory is available. The responsiveness is also not as expected. I have only a few lines to be

Re: Filechooser and Bookmarks spec

2008-02-11 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 18:01 +0100, nf2 wrote: > > there is a patch already for the standard gtk+ filesystem backend at: > > > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147434 > > > > it will use GBookmarkFile to store the file chooser shortcuts and move > > the shortcuts across from the old i

Re: Filechooser and Bookmarks spec

2008-02-11 Thread nf2
Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:01 +0100, nf2 wrote: > > >> I just wanted to ask about your plans regarding using a standardized >> format for file-management bookmarks. >> > > there is a patch already for the standard gtk+ filesystem backend at: > > http://bugzilla.gnom

Re: Filechooser and Bookmarks spec

2008-02-11 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:01 +0100, nf2 wrote: > I just wanted to ask about your plans regarding using a standardized > format for file-management bookmarks. there is a patch already for the standard gtk+ filesystem backend at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147434 it will use GBoo

Filechooser and Bookmarks spec

2008-02-11 Thread nf2
Hi GTK+ developers, I just wanted to ask about your plans regarding using a standardized format for file-management bookmarks. I think KDE is already using XBEL for this, and GLib also has an XBEL parser. Are there any other obstacles than agreeing on the location and name of such a shared bookma