2008/7/18 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/7/17 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2008/7/17 Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here are some alternate ideas, just brainstorming:
>>>
>>> 1) have an iterator concept in gobject-introspection and
Hans Breuer wrote:
>
> Am 18.07.2008 15:32, Owen Taylor schrieb:
>> I don't see the virtue of a gtk1-compat library... it's just shuffling
>> non-maintainership around forever.
> My attempt to a constructive answer is: just let the people who need the
> compatibility keep gtk-2.x alive within the
Am 18.07.2008 15:32, Owen Taylor schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 13:15 +0200, Colin Leroy wrote:
[...]
The 1.x -> 2.0 change was painful for everyone who had an app that
needed porting, however I find it pretty irrelevant in comparison to
2.x -> 3.0.
Well, if no libgtk-compat is planned, it
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 14:33 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 14:23 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> At leas Philip's iterators would shift some of the burden of making APIs
> bindings friendly into the library authors themselves, and contribute
> for language binding
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 05:51:24PM +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> I would like to propose this API to go into glib/gio:
>
> http://live.gnome.org/IteratorsAPI
I'd like to point to my comment on that page: Please make the Iterator
interface derive from the Iterable interface, where the iterator(
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 14:23 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Philip Van Hoof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You could make a GLib.Iterator that uses gobject-introspection, but I
> > don't think you want to make gobject-introspection the one thing
> > everyb
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 13:15 +0200, Colin Leroy wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:55:59 +0200, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > A suggestion that came up in the post-guadec discussions was to move
> > deprecated widgets to libgtk3-compat instead of removing them. This
> > means that applica
Hi Havoc,
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 13:37 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 2) Another idea would be an equivalent to registering boxed types:
>
> g_iterator_type_register_static(const char *name, GBoxedCopyFunc
> boxed_copy, GBoxedFreeFunc boxed_free, GIteratorNextFunc
> iterator_next, GIteratorGetFu
