Felipe Contreras wrote:
> How should applications use sockets with GIO?
>
> I'm interested in hostname resolution, and socket handling. If
> possible also proxy handling.
There isn't yet a good story here. See
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=515973 and
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug
Hi,
How should applications use sockets with GIO?
I'm interested in hostname resolution, and socket handling. If
possible also proxy handling.
Any pointers?
--
Felipe Contreras
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnom
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2007, 08:52 +0100 schrieb Sven Neumann:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 17:14 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
>
> > > char *g_format_file_size_for_display (goffset size);
> > >
> > > Ideally this one needs to take another parameter indicating
> whether you
> > > want
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Alberto Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> Thinking again, most of the detail strings are actually redundant if
>> the engine is allowed to know what kind of widget is drawn.
>
> No, they are not always redundant, and the engine is allowed actually.
I did no
2008/9/3 Robert Staudinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Benjamin Berg
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Here's what I learned so far:
>>> - The biggest issue is the impedance mismatch between configuring
>>> widget style properties in gtkrc while engines are bu
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Benjamin Berg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> Here's what I learned so far:
>> - The biggest issue is the impedance mismatch between configuring
>> widget style properties in gtkrc while engines are built around
>> drawing primitives.
>
> Not quite sure what y
