Il giorno gio, 15/01/2009 alle 16.41 -0500, Havoc Pennington ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> > I already considered my doubt as answered (see below), but I disagree
> > with what you say: if you call size_request "minimum size", why don't
> > you
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> I already considered my doubt as answered (see below), but I disagree
> with what you say: if you call size_request "minimum size", why don't
> you fulfill it, and how do you call "set_size_request"?!
>
> Maybe you meant set_size_req
Il giorno gio, 15/01/2009 alle 09.41 -0500, Havoc Pennington ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> 2009/1/14 Pietro Battiston :
> >
> > the documentation for gtk_widget_size_request () says:
> >
> > "Also remember that the size request is not necessarily the size a
> > widget will actually be allocated."
> >
> >
Hi,
2009/1/14 Pietro Battiston :
>
> the documentation for gtk_widget_size_request () says:
>
> "Also remember that the size request is not necessarily the size a
> widget will actually be allocated."
>
> While there may be a lot of reasons why a widget doesn't get the area
> requested, I imagine(
Hello devel list,
during the last months I looked for a way to bring animation into Gtk+. The
last few weeks I looked especially into an idea timj came up with. I try to
give a briefly overview over it here.
The idea
The main idea is to obtain the pixmap representation of a widget in the main
Il giorno gio, 15/01/2009 alle 08.55 +0200, Kalle Vahlman ha scritto:
> So while setting sensible minimum sizes and constraining maximum by
> ellipsation or scrolled container for your *widgets* makes totally
> sense (to ensure the application will be usable on the first run),
> taking over the win
Il giorno mer, 14/01/2009 alle 23.00 +0200, Markku Vire ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> 0On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 17:00 +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> >
> > > Forcibly clipping window size would anyway only be band-aid to the
> > > real problem in the application, which can be:
> ...
> > > - it doesn't con
