Hello,
First off, I am not entirely sure if this is the correct mailing list for this
message; if there is a better one to post to, please direct me to it and
accept my apologies for the noise.
I've taken the liberty of cleaning up some minor (whitespace) issues with the
patches on bug 56249
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Stefan Kost wrote:
> hi,
>
> Simos Xenitellis schrieb:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Simos
>> Xenitellis wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Stefan Kost wrote:
Murray Cumming schrieb:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 22:23 +0300, Stefan Kost wrote:
GTK+ 2.16.4 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.16/
http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.16/
md5 sums:
d666f9f5a544e9d4d45804d88b1b5c4d gtk+-2.16.4.tar.bz2
8b6010c62013808d549474e4e5fcc7be gtk+-2.16.4.tar.gz
sha1 sums:
e162f21fc587d9856b1560c461953bb9bcec2242 g
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> The client-side-windows branch has now been merged into master.
Thanks Alex. This should be exciting. I'll be looking at doing a
development release including this towards the end of the week, for
increased exposure...
___
hi,
Simos Xenitellis schrieb:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Simos
> Xenitellis wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Stefan Kost wrote:
>>> Murray Cumming schrieb:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 22:23 +0300, Stefan Kost wrote:
> Unfortunately the docbook to pdf chain is in terrible state
Hi,
what do people think about exposing that functionality as perhaps
g_content_type_get_supertypes()?
Rationale in this ticket:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584388
Thanks,
Tomeu
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
h
The client-side-windows branch has now been merged into master.
The current state of this code is pretty good. There are two known
regressions on X11 (see http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/ClientSideWindows),
but both are corner cases. The quartz backend is supposed to be at least
as good as the old o
