Re: Problems with GBufferedOutputStream

2009-08-14 Thread Sebastian Pölsterl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jürg Billeter schrieb: > On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 20:49 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote: >> I came across a problem with GBufferedOutputStream and >> g_output_stream_write recently. If I try to write more data than the >> buffer size, not everything is wr

Re: Problems with GBufferedOutputStream

2009-08-14 Thread Jürg Billeter
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 20:49 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote: > I came across a problem with GBufferedOutputStream and > g_output_stream_write recently. If I try to write more data than the > buffer size, not everything is written to the file. >From the documentation of g_output_stream_write: "On

Re: GZip{In,Out}putStream in GIO?

2009-08-14 Thread Shaun McCance
> > 2009/7/31 Brian J. Tarricone: > >> On 07/31/2009 05:48 AM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: > >> > >>> From the looks of it, it should be straight forward to write > >>> GZip{In,Out}putStream classes based on zlib > >> I'd say call it GCompressed{In,Out}putStream and have it either auto-detec

Problems with GBufferedOutputStream

2009-08-14 Thread Sebastian Pölsterl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I came across a problem with GBufferedOutputStream and g_output_stream_write recently. If I try to write more data than the buffer size, not everything is written to the file. The attached example should write: 0123456894568 This is just a simple

patches to make gtk head build on win32 with MSVC

2009-08-14 Thread Shixin Zeng
Hi, all I spent a day on building gtk head on win32 by utilizing OAH (https://launchpad.net/oah) and came up with these small patches. I'm not sure if I should file a bug report first and then attach patches there, since they are so small and trivial. The 6th and 7th are not required, since gdk d

Re: Quartz DnD patch review & approval sought

2009-08-14 Thread Alberto Ruiz
2009/8/12 Kristian Rietveld : > Hi Paul and John, > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:17 PM, John Ralls wrote: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588449 I'd appreciate some more review and possible approval of this patch. It would remove the last substantive item in the patch t

Re: Notes and thoughts on the GTK+ meeting at GUADEC

2009-08-14 Thread Alberto Ruiz
2009/8/14 Kristian Rietveld : > Hi All, > A different way to start working on the new features is to decide on a > feature set first, research the features and (if required) make > required changes *before* an ABI frozen GTK+ 3.0 is put out.  This > brings up the next question: what features to res