On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>
> Maybe a better direction to push would be, adding some gtk-doc annotations
> to make sure the resulting gobject-introspection data is more rich and
> accurate ?
Introspection currently assumes any function matching foo_bar_new.* is
a c
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Andrew Paprocki wrote:
> 2009/11/4 Sven Herzberg :
>> In my opinion the GTK+ way is really nice (just compare it to GStreamers
>> element factory, which behaves essentially the same way, just as
>> GnomeCanvas' gnome_canvas_item_new() function). It's really nice to
2009/11/4 Sven Herzberg :
> In my opinion the GTK+ way is really nice (just compare it to GStreamers
> element factory, which behaves essentially the same way, just as
> GnomeCanvas' gnome_canvas_item_new() function). It's really nice to get
> those items returned as the generic type (but Cody told
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 06:23 +0100 schrieb Javier Jardón:
> The question: why is it normal for GTK widget "constructors" to return
> GtkWidget and not their real type?
Cody perfectly replied to that already.
> PD: If there is not technical reasons, maybe we can change this for
> GTK+ 3
