Re: GSettings test case problems

2010-05-15 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca wrote: Hi, I was just running dconf through the GSettings test suite and I realised that we have a fairly serious issue that blocks that from working. The test suite uses this fairly typical gtester pattern of forking off expected

GtkAdjustment woes

2010-05-15 Thread Tadej Borovšak
Hi all. I'm doing my best to update GtkAdjustment API docs and migrate them into sources. But during this endeavor I stumbled upon some issues that should probably be resolved first. One thing is clamping of GtkAdjustment::value. Currently, value is clamped between values of GtkAdjustment::lower

Re: thoughts on GSettingsList

2010-05-15 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
Hi Ryan, Let me just dump my thoughts on this based on my experience with g-t. It may help with your design. In g-t, the user names a profile and can rename it later. The name can have arbitrary Unicode characters. Logically it means that the name cannot be used directly in the conf database,

Re: thoughts on GSettingsList

2010-05-15 Thread Ryan Lortie
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 14:45 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: It would be immensely helpful if GSettingsList can do the cleaning up and dup-avoiding part. So, add_item() will in fact get a name *hint*, clean it [1] up, avoid dup, and return the key name. Note that in the interface I gave,