On 08/15/2010 06:41 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>> because loading tons of small libraries is actually going to cost
>> much more in terms of resources (memory, I/O, linking and loading
>> time)
> Really ? did you measure it ?
Can you prove that it doesn't? Until you can, there's no logical reaso
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 14:41 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Emmanuele Bassi schrieb:
>
> > because loading tons of small libraries is actually going to cost
> > much more in terms of resources (memory, I/O, linking and loading time)
>
> Really ? did you measure it ?
it's been measured multip
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:57 AM, cee1 wrote:
> I've written a test program, which creating watches for two GIOChannels: one
> for stdin with a low priority, and the other for a named pipe with a high
> priority. Then ran the program with no data written to the named pipe, it
> can still respo
* Emmanuele Bassi schrieb:
> because loading tons of small libraries is actually going to cost
> much more in terms of resources (memory, I/O, linking and loading time)
Really ? did you measure it ?
How often do typically gtk applications get startet - how many
per second ?
Most of the time
