On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 21:49 +0200, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a bug report for this :
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619468
I've always told you guys on the DirectFB list that you should notify me
about fixes for the DirectFB backend. I don't have the time to actual
2010/8/25 Javier Jardón :
> 2010/8/25 John Stowers :
>>
>> For Google, and those that find this thread brings bad news, I
>> stumbled across a developers branch that gets Gtk+-2.20 working with
>> DirectFB again.
>
>> [1] http://mail.directfb.org/pipermail/directfb-dev/2010-May/005704.html
>> [2] h
2010/8/25 John Stowers :
>
> For Google, and those that find this thread brings bad news, I
> stumbled across a developers branch that gets Gtk+-2.20 working with
> DirectFB again.
> [1] http://mail.directfb.org/pipermail/directfb-dev/2010-May/005704.html
> [2] http://git.potipota.net/cgi-bin/cgit
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Mike Emmel wrote:
> I just got the message on all the bug reports that the DirectFB
> backend is being removed for 3.0.
>
> First you waited too long to do it. I'm glad its finally removed.
For Google, and those that find this thread brings bad news, I
stumbled ac
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:59, Mike Emmel wrote:
> In my years of working on embedded linux I've seen the embedded
> community do and awful lot of taking from the opensource community and
> very little in the way of giving back. Perhaps the decision to remove
> DirectFB support can serve is a bit
I just got the message on all the bug reports that the DirectFB
backend is being removed for 3.0.
First you waited too long to do it. I'm glad its finally removed.
I tried to do the build and they will come approach hoping that if a
decent port was resurrected a community would
form.
Well they d
