Re: GTK+ 2.22.0 released

2010-09-23 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I've released a stable gdk-pixbuf 2.22 a few days ago, and a stable > glib 2.26 should be out before the end of the week. > > On 9/23/10, Allin Cottrell wrote: > > > > If this is intended to be a "latest stable" release it seems to me > > a bug that i

Re: GTK+ 2.22.0 released

2010-09-23 Thread Matthias Clasen
I've released a stable gdk-pixbuf 2.22 a few days ago, and a stable glib 2.26 should be out before the end of the week. On 9/23/10, Allin Cottrell wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Matthias Clasen wrote: > >> GTK+ 2.22.0 is now available for download... > > If this is intended to be a "latest stable"

Re: GTK+ 2.22.0 released

2010-09-23 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Matthias Clasen wrote: > GTK+ 2.22.0 is now available for download... If this is intended to be a "latest stable" release it seems to me a bug that it depends on "unstable" GLib (and also apparently on a self-referential GdkPixbuf update). Here are the errors I'm getting from

Re: Minutes of the GTK+ Team Meeting - 2010-09-21

2010-09-23 Thread Matthias Clasen
> I hate coding style discussions, just for the record. Lets end this right here then. I've added a CODING-STYLE document now. Feel free to hate it. ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel

Re: Minutes of the GTK+ Team Meeting - 2010-09-21

2010-09-23 Thread Paul Davis
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > the other objection, "debug statements require toggling braces" is > easily dispatched with: if you're adding debugging notes then use the > conditional debugging facilities that gtk+ provides - GDK_NOTE and > GTK_NOTE - and don't remove t

Re: Minutes of the GTK+ Team Meeting - 2010-09-21

2010-09-23 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 19:35 +0200, ecyrbe wrote: > > > 2010/9/22 Emmanuele Bassi > Minutes of the GTK+ Team Meeting - 2010-09-21 > > • coding style conventions > - proposal: adopt the Clutter document, as it codifies the gtk > + as well > - invest

GTK+ 2.22.0 released

2010-09-23 Thread Matthias Clasen
GTK+ 2.22.0 is now available for download at: http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.22/ ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.22/ sha256 sums: d9522c80d4b8a954f7474e32bd5a99ba3051996f1c4681426db5f79a1c1b4602 gtk +-2.22.0.tar.bz2 d0247ca6619a0ec2fa3f2f042a7d3a72fbacec4f5ad72f67aafb0f5f03be3c0b gtk +-

Re: Minutes of the GTK+ Team Meeting - 2010-09-21

2010-09-23 Thread ecyrbe
2010/9/22 Emmanuele Bassi > Minutes of the GTK+ Team Meeting - 2010-09-21 > > • coding style conventions > - proposal: adopt the Clutter document, as it codifies the gtk+ as well > - investigate an indent script to distribute with gtk+ > > I know that these coding styles are already in action in

Re: rendering-cleanup Part 2

2010-09-23 Thread Kristian Rietveld
Another status update for Quartz. I pushed some commits to the rendering-cleanup branch that make most things (some tests, gtk-demo) work on Quartz again. The one thing that is still crashing are offscreen windows, I am still looking into that. After that, I need to look into rendering-clean

GtkTreeView Refactoring Considerations [was Re: Private types inside GTK+]

2010-09-23 Thread Tristan Van Berkom
Please excuse the double-posting here, I neglected to create a new thread and I really needed this to stand out as a separate subject line. Sorry. On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 15:00 +0200, Kristian Rietveld wrote: [...] > As I also noted in the bug, I would not make GtkTreeViewColumn a stand-alone > cl

Re: Private types inside GTK+

2010-09-23 Thread Tristan Van Berkom
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 15:00 +0200, Kristian Rietveld wrote: [...] > As I also noted in the bug, I would not make GtkTreeViewColumn a stand-alone > class, rather, I would work on getting the algorithms that do the cell and > column layouting in separate classes and then have GtkTreeView, > GtkTre