Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 17.11.2010, 16:25 +0100 schrieb Max Schwarz:
> > > Do you have an idea on how to implement this? I think Qt's model is quite
> > > nice, they have a 'delta' field in their event [3] which gives more
> > > precise information. Of course, If you want to retain API compability
>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Shaun McCance wrote:
> If we break API on this, I think it would be best to do it
> in a way that the compiler catches it. Just adding a field
> to GdkEventScroll will trip up a lot of developers.
Not really. There is (1) no change in the structure size (2) no ch
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:53 +0100, Max Schwarz wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2010, um 16:40:16 schrieben Sie:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Max Schwarz wrote:
> > > The problem is not with large deltas (which are thrown away in the
> > > current OSX version, if I understand the patch
Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2010, um 16:40:16 schrieben Sie:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Max Schwarz wrote:
> > The problem is not with large deltas (which are thrown away in the
> > current OSX version, if I understand the patch correctly), but with
> > small deltas, which get emitted from
FYI
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/
behdad
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Max Schwarz wrote:
> The problem is not with large deltas (which are thrown away in the current OSX
> version, if I understand the patch correctly), but with small deltas, which
> get emitted from Xorg with a pretty high frequency.
my initial response to this wa
Hi,
> > Do you have an idea on how to implement this? I think Qt's model is quite
> > nice, they have a 'delta' field in their event [3] which gives more
> > precise information. Of course, If you want to retain API compability
> > (which I think you do) a new event would have to be introduced tha
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Sven Herzberg wrote:
> No, you don't have to. Here is a patch for the Mac OS X backend which
> implements this. (Let me check tonight whether I can find my cleaned up
> version and attach it to that bug.)
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516725
heh
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Max Schwarz wrote:
> Do you have an idea on how to implement this? I think Qt's model is quite
> nice, they have a 'delta' field in their event [3] which gives more precise
> information. Of course, If you want to retain API compability (which I think
> you do) a
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 17.11.2010, 13:29 +0100 schrieb Max Schwarz:
> Do you have an idea on how to implement this? I think Qt's model is quite
> nice, they have a 'delta' field in their event [3] which gives more precise
> information. Of course, If you want to retain API compability (which I thi
Hi!,
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 13:29 +0100, Max Schwarz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently developing patches for the X11 ecosystem to provide higher-
> resolution scrolling for devices that support it (touchpads, trackpoints,
> etc). My patches are kept in a github repo ([1]).
Was aware of your work,
Hi,
I'm currently developing patches for the X11 ecosystem to provide higher-
resolution scrolling for devices that support it (touchpads, trackpoints,
etc). My patches are kept in a github repo ([1]).
It looks like my patch will get merged into Xorg eventually (see my thread
over at xorg-devel
2010/11/16 Petr Tomasek :
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:15:43PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
>> What is stopping you using the GDK API to get the extents of the
>> monitors from the unified "screen" and say positioning the speakers
>> notes on one monitor and the presentation on the other?
>
> There ar
13 matches
Mail list logo
