I am saving a jpeg image from a GdkPixbuf using:
gdk_pixbuf_save (pxb, inFile, $gerror, quality, 100, NULL);
Can I specify a resolution?
I've tried the parameter names dpi, resolution, and Resolution,
but GDK dumps the warning: (imagemask:21053): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **:
Unrecognized parameter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/15/2010 08:18 AM, Tim Corio wrote:
I am saving a jpeg image from a GdkPixbuf using:
gdk_pixbuf_save (pxb, inFile, $gerror, quality, 100, NULL);
Can I specify a resolution?
I've tried the parameter names dpi, resolution, and Resolution,
From: Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com
$(q...@(B treeview refactoring
- massive refactoring
- 41 files changed, 13568 insertions(+), 3204 deletions(-)
- GtkCellArea
- moves code out of TreeViewColumn to allow sharing with other cell-based
view widgets (GtkIconView, GtkComboBox)
2010/12/15 Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com:
Are this treeview refactoring mostly internal, or are there specific
API changes? After this refactoring it would be required to be
modified the apps using GtkTreeView?
Anyway I was also thinking on GailTreeView, the object that provides
the
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 14:08 +0100, Piñeiro wrote:
From: Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com
• treeview refactoring
- massive refactoring
- 41 files changed, 13568 insertions(+), 3204 deletions(-)
- GtkCellArea
- moves code out of TreeViewColumn to allow sharing with other
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:53 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
There's one behavioural change, gtk_tree_view_set_cursor() when
specifying start_editing = TRUE will no longer toggle the state
of an activatable cell (this used to be the case, we thought it
was an undesirable side effect since the
From: Tristan Van Berkom trista...@openismus.com
I expect libgail to not need any changes, we paid special attention
that focus navigation was going to work the same way using the new
code... however there could be some fallout I'm not aware of...
And as usually test if there are any fallout
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 15:42 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:53 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
There's one behavioural change, gtk_tree_view_set_cursor() when
specifying start_editing = TRUE will no longer toggle the state
of an activatable cell (this used to be the
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:35 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
One of the files in the new (to introspection) cmph directory, chd_ph.c,
includes an anonymous union which requires -std=gnu99 to compile. Is that OK?
This would have been better as a bug. However, if what you're
*really*
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Alan alan.mcgov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I'm just looking at generating bindings for .NET and I've hit an
issue. For the .NET bindings you need to supply the native library
name along with the function to invoke. I've noticed that the gir
format likes to
On Dec 15, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:35 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
One of the files in the new (to introspection) cmph directory, chd_ph.c,
includes an anonymous union which requires -std=gnu99 to compile. Is that OK?
This would have
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
But since you bring it up, what is the official policy? Is it C89? Is it
published somewhere?
For GTK+, we're generally avoiding C++ comments, since they cause
problems for the compilers that are used on win32. What other
On Dec 15, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
But since you bring it up, what is the official policy? Is it C89? Is it
published somewhere?
For GTK+, we're generally avoiding C++ comments, since they cause
13 matches
Mail list logo
