I posted this the last time this subject came up (twice last year, I
think), but I made this valgrind suppression file for my project:
http://www.vips.ecs.soton.ac.uk/development/nip2.supp
With this, I get no reported leaks in my huge (200,000 lines of C)
application on Ubuntu with current
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:14:16AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Well, I think the easiest thing is to explain at the top of each
version, like I did for 3. Though now that library can parallel
display the two I need to update it to say GTK+ 2 is at /gtk and GTK3
is at /gtk3.
Perhaps easiest
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Alan alan.mcgov...@gmail.com wrote:
In .NET it is invalid to generate a property or a method which is the
same name as an event as it is ambiguous as to whether you're invoking
the event or calling the method.
Yeah, this fits into a general class of corner
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Well, I think the easiest thing is to explain at the top of each
version, like I did for 3. Though now that library can parallel
display the two I need to update it to say GTK+ 2 is at /gtk and GTK3
is at /gtk3.
I
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Similarly it would make sense to have the GTK+ 2 docs mention GTK3.
This is a good idea, indeed.
How about these two patches for GTK3 and GTK2 respectively? Not
tested, building now.
From
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Similarly it would make sense to have the GTK+ 2 docs mention GTK3.
This is a good idea, indeed.
How about these two patches for GTK3
